Literature DB >> 9438948

Maternal satisfaction with management in labour and preference for mode of delivery.

M Geary1, M Fanagan, P Boylan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess women's level of satisfaction with management during labour and to ascertain their preference for mode of delivery. The basis for the findings was the cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire survey of 520 women at a Dublin obstetric hospital. Visual analogue scales were used to assess degree of satisfaction. The response rate was 63% (520 of 830). 98.5% of women had hoped for a vaginal delivery and 1.5% for a Cesarean section. All primiparas had wanted a vaginal delivery. The majority of women were satisfied with their care in labour (65% had a score of > or = 7). Factors significantly associated with high levels of satisfaction were good analgesia during labour (particularly epidural), vaginal delivery, adequate preparation for labour and if personal wishes were listened to by staff. Almost all women have a preference for vaginal delivery. Satisfaction with care in labour is significantly influenced by vaginal delivery, empathetic communication by staff and good analgesia in labour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9438948     DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1997.25.5.433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  8 in total

Review 1.  Economic considerations related to providing adequate pain relief for women in labour: comparison of epidural and intravenous analgesia.

Authors:  Cecil Huang; Alex Macario
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  A Framework for the Development of maternal quality of care indicators.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Kimberly D Gregory; Michael C Lu; Carolina Reyes; Calvin J Hobel; Gilberto F Chavez
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-09

3.  Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route.

Authors:  Andrea R Thurman; James S Zoller; Steven E Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-05-14

Review 4.  External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Regina Kulier; Helen M West
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 5.  Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  A Mazzoni; F Althabe; N H Liu; A M Bonotti; L Gibbons; A J Sánchez; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 7.331

6.  Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.

Authors:  Jonathan M Tan; Alex Macario; Brendan Carvalho; Maurice L Druzin; Yasser Y El-Sayed
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betrán; Pilar Montilla; Elisa Scolaro; Armando Seuc; Agustina Mazzoni; Fernando Althabe; Francesca Merzagora; Gian Paolo Donzelli; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  External cephalic version for breech presentation before term.

Authors:  Eileen K Hutton; G Justus Hofmeyr; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.