Literature DB >> 9434653

Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus positively affect dietitian practices and patient outcomes. The Diabetes Care and Education Dietetic Practice Group.

K Kulkarni1, G Castle, R Gregory, A Holmes, C Leontos, M Powers, L Snetselaar, P Splett, J Wylie-Rosett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Assess the acceptance and ease of use of Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus by dietitians in a variety of settings; determine if nutrition care activities of dietitians change when practice guidelines are available; measure changes in patient control of blood glucose level, measured as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); compare patient satisfaction with care and perceptions about quality of life.
DESIGN: Using the approach of outcomes research, volunteer dietitians were recruited and assigned randomly to a usual care group or a practice guidelines group. Patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled by dietitians and followed up for a 3-month period. Outcome measures included dietitian care activities, changes in patient HbA1c levels, and patient satisfaction and perceptions about quality of life. SUBJECTS/SETTINGS: Dietitians from across the United States who responded to a recruitment notice participated. Their work settings included diabetes referral centers, endocrinology clinics, primary care and community health clinics, hospitals, and a worksite clinic. They recruited patients from their setting for the study. Outcome data were available from dietitians providing care to 24 patients using the new practice guidelines and dietitians providing care to 30 patients using more traditional methods. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: chi 2 Test, t test, and analysis of covariance.
RESULTS: Dietitians in the practice guidelines group spent 63% more time with patients and were more likely to do an assessment and discuss results with patients than dietitians in the usual care group. Practice guidelines dietitians paid greater attention to glycemic control goals. Levels of HbA1c improved at 3 months in 21 (88%) of practice guidelines patients compared with 16 (53%) of usual care patients. Practice guidelines patients achieved greater reductions in HbA1c level than usual care patients (-1.00 vs -0.33). This difference was statistically significant and clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: Dietitians responded positively to practice guidelines for type 1 diabetes. Use of guidelines resulted in changes in dietitian practices and produced greater improvements in patient blood glucose outcomes at 3 months compared with usual care. Practice guidelines did not significantly influence patient satisfaction with care of perceived quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9434653     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(98)00017-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  26 in total

1.  The use of three strategies to improve quality of care at a national level.

Authors:  Jeannette P P So; James G Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  New Diabetes Nutrition Therapy Recommendations: What You Need to Know.

Authors:  Alison B Evert; Jackie L Boucher
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2014-05

3.  Associations between technical quality of diabetes care and patient experience.

Authors:  Onyebuchi A Arah; Bastiaan Roset; Diana M J Delnoij; Niek S Klazinga; Karien Stronks
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  The gap between practice and guidelines in the choice of first-line disease modifying antirheumatic drug in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.

Authors:  Mathilde Benhamou; Nathalie Rincheval; Carine Roy; Violaine Foltz; Sylvie Rozenberg; Jean Sibilia; Thierry Schaeverbeke; Pierre Bourgeois; Philippe Ravaud; Bruno Fautrel
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 5.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Anik Giguère; France Légaré; Jeremy Grimshaw; Stéphane Turcotte; Michelle Fiander; Agnes Grudniewicz; Sun Makosso-Kallyth; Fredric M Wolf; Anna P Farmer; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 6.  Medical and Psychological Considerations for Carbohydrate-Restricted Diets in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Katherine A S Gallagher; Daniel DeSalvo; Justin Gregory; Marisa E Hilliard
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 7.  Medications or lifestyle change with medical nutrition therapy.

Authors:  Joyce Green Pastors
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  National prevalence of lifestyle counseling or referral among African-Americans and whites with diabetes.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Hui Tang; G Caleb Alexander; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Assessment of dietary practice among diabetic patients in the United arab emirates.

Authors:  Juma Al-Kaabi; Fatma Al-Maskari; Hussein Saadi; Bachar Afandi; Hasratali Parkar; Nicolaas Nagelkerke
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2008-08-10

10.  Diabetes Interactive Diary: a new telemedicine system enabling flexible diet and insulin therapy while improving quality of life: an open-label, international, multicenter, randomized study.

Authors:  Maria C E Rossi; Antonio Nicolucci; Paolo Di Bartolo; Daniela Bruttomesso; Angela Girelli; Francisco J Ampudia; David Kerr; Antonio Ceriello; Carmen De La Questa Mayor; Fabio Pellegrini; David Horwitz; Giacomo Vespasiani
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.