Literature DB >> 9433095

The value of long-term follow-up of mandibular advancement surgery in patients with a low to normal mandibular plane angle.

J P Bouwman1, D B Tuinzing, P J Kostense, R A van Teeseling, H Mokhtari.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the stability of mandibular advancement via bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. Two fixation methods were compared: intermaxillary fixation (IMF) and rigid internal fixation (RIF). The hypothesis was that, in patients with a low to normal mandibular plane angle (MPA) in retrognathia, the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) to advance the mandible is a predictable and stable procedure and that no significant changes occur after 1 year. Twelve patients with mandibular deficiency with a low to normal MPA (mean 24.7 degrees, range 20.3 degrees-30.7 degrees) underwent BSSO with IMF. The follow-up period was at least 5 years (mean 6.3, range 5-9.1 years). Cephalometric analysis using a commercial software package was performed on radiographs that were taken immediately preoperatively (T0), within 6 weeks postoperatively (T1), 1 year postoperatively (T2), and at least 5 years postoperatively (T3). The average advancement at B point was 4.7 mm (range: 3-7 mm). The assessment of B point in regard to relapse showed no significant change. One patient showed a relapse due to condylar resorption. Forty-five consecutive patients were treated with RIF. Radiographs were taken preoperatively (T0), 6 weeks postoperatively (T1), and 1 year postoperatively (T2). This group had a mean MPA of 26.2 degrees, range 10 degrees-32 degrees. The average B-point advancement was 4.4 mm (range 1-10 mm). No patient showed a clinically significant relapse at T2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9433095     DOI: 10.1007/BF03043574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  24 in total

1.  Stability of mandibular advancement after sagittal osteotomy with screw or wire fixation: a comparative study.

Authors:  I M Watzke; T A Turvey; C Phillips; W R Proffit
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Temporomandibular joint fibrous ankylosis following orthognathic surgery: report of eight cases.

Authors:  D W Nitzan; M F Dolwick
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1989

3.  Stability of sagittal split osteotomies. A comparison of three stabilization techniques.

Authors:  D H Perrott; Y F Lu; M A Pogrel; L B Kaban
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1994-12

4.  Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement: a comparison of two rigid internal fixation techniques.

Authors:  J E Blomqvist; S Isaksson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Mandibular advancement procedures: predictable stability and relapse.

Authors:  R B Greebe; D B Tuinzing
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1984-01

6.  Osseous healing of the sagittal ramus osteotomy: a histologic comparison of rigid and nonrigid fixation in Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  E Ellis; D S Carlson; J Billups
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Stability of the osteotomy site following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: screw fixation v IMF.

Authors:  G D Putnam; J P Bouwman; D B Tuinzing
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.651

8.  Condylar resorption in orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study.

Authors:  C A De Clercq; L F Neyt; M Y Mommaerts; J V Abeloos; B M De Mot
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1994

9.  Skeletal stability following sagittal split osteotomy using monocortical miniplate internal fixation.

Authors:  B C Rubens; P J Stoelinga; P A Blijdorp; J H Schoenaers; C Politis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Condylar position following mandibular advancement: its relationship to relapse.

Authors:  L A Will; D R Joondeph; T H Hohl; R A West
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-Term Study of Relapse After Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery: Advancement Versus Setback.

Authors:  N K Sahoo; Shiv Shankar Agarwal; Sanjeev Datana; S K Bhandari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-08-31

2.  One-year stability of the mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation for correction of the skeletal class II malocclusion and high mandibular plane angle: Dental and skeletal aspect.

Authors:  Muhammad Ruslin; Andi Sitti Hajrah Yusuf; Tymour Forouzanfar; Rokus Barendregt Greebe; Dirk Bram Tuinzing; Sri Astuti Thamrin; Paolo Boffano; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement: is it influenced by the magnitude of advancement or changes of the mandibular plane angle?

Authors:  Reza Tabrizi; Mahsa Nili; Ehsan Aliabadi; Fereydoun Pourdanesh
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.