J E Blomqvist1, S Isaksson. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Länssjukhuset, Halmstad, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare two different methods of rigid fixation for any difference in postoperative stability after mandibular advancement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with Class II malocclusion treated by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and mandibular advancement were selected for this retrospective study. Group A (n = 16) had noncompressive bicortical screws inserted in the gonial area through a transcutaneous approach and Group B (n = 22) had the bone segments fixed with unicortical screws and miniplates on the lateral surface of the mandibular body. Cephalograms were taken preoperatively, 2 days postoperatively, and 6 months after the operation, and a computer program was used to superimpose the three cephalograms and register the advancement and postoperative instability. RESULTS: There was a minimal difference in advancement of the mandible in the two groups. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in postsurgical stability. However, positive correlation between the amount of advancement and the amount of postsurgical instability was demonstrated using a linear multiple regression test (P = .0002). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the two different methods of internal rigid fixation of the segments after surgical advancement of the mandible give equal stability postoperatively and their use is a matter of surgical choice.
OBJECTIVE: To compare two different methods of rigid fixation for any difference in postoperative stability after mandibular advancement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with Class II malocclusion treated by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and mandibular advancement were selected for this retrospective study. Group A (n = 16) had noncompressive bicortical screws inserted in the gonial area through a transcutaneous approach and Group B (n = 22) had the bone segments fixed with unicortical screws and miniplates on the lateral surface of the mandibular body. Cephalograms were taken preoperatively, 2 days postoperatively, and 6 months after the operation, and a computer program was used to superimpose the three cephalograms and register the advancement and postoperative instability. RESULTS: There was a minimal difference in advancement of the mandible in the two groups. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in postsurgical stability. However, positive correlation between the amount of advancement and the amount of postsurgical instability was demonstrated using a linear multiple regression test (P = .0002). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the two different methods of internal rigid fixation of the segments after surgical advancement of the mandible give equal stability postoperatively and their use is a matter of surgical choice.
Authors: José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto Journal: J Appl Oral Sci Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.698