Literature DB >> 9431629

A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical features related to radiographic findings.

B Jönsson1, M Annertz, C Sjöberg, B Strömqvist.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate symptoms and signs in patients undergoing surgery for central spinal stenosis and to correlate the findings to age, preoperative duration of symptoms, and radiographically detected constriction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The degree of constriction of the spinal canal considered to be symptomatic of lumbar canal stenosis is not clear, nor is the relation between the clinical appearance of the disease and the degree of radiographically verified constriction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred five consecutive patients scheduled for decompression surgery were included in a prospective study. The day before surgery, all patients were interviewed and examined, using a defined protocol that included data on age, gender, preoperative duration of symptoms, walking ability, and occurrence of pain at rest and at night. Included were data recording straight leg raising test results, reflex disturbance, and extensor hallucis longus muscle weakness. All radiographs were examined by a neuroradiologist. The anteroposterior diameters at each site from L1-L2 to L5-S1 were recorded. For the computer analysis, the site of and width at the narrowest site was registered, as well as the number of sites with an anteroposterior diameter of less than 10 mm. A statistical analysis was performed using chi-square analysis, nonparametric tests, analysis of variance, and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Pain at rest and at night was reported by 68 and 60 patients, respectively, and was more common in younger patients (P = 0.065 and 0.015, respectively). A severe reduction of walking ability (< 0.5 km) was reported by 70 patients. The straight leg raising test results were negative in 70 patients, positive > 60 degrees in 16, positive 30-60 degrees in 14, and positive < 30 degrees in 5. Younger patients had a positive straight leg raising result (P = 0.028, analysis of variance) more often. Reflex disturbances correlated to patient age: Older patients had reflex disturbances more often. There was no correlation between preoperative duration and pain or neurologic disturbances: Patients with longer preoperative duration of symptoms did not demonstrate more severe symptoms. There was a total myelographic block of the spinal canal in 13 patients. The mean value of the antero-posterior diameter in the other patients was 6.8 mm (range, 4-11 mm). In patients younger than 70 years L4-L5 was the site for the most pronounced constriction, whereas L3-L4 was the narrowest site in the older patients. Degenerative spondylolisthesis was found in 32 patients, and they had a more pronounced constriction of the spinal canal (5.6 mm compared with 6.7 mm in those without displacement, P = 0.02). There was a (nonsignificant) tendency toward more walking disturbances in patients with a more pronounced constriction of the spine. There was no correlation between reflex disturbances or extensor hallucis longus weakness and radiographically detected constriction.
CONCLUSION: Pain was more intense and positive straight leg raising test results were more common in younger patients, whereas reflex disturbances were more common in the elderly. The vertebral site for the lowest anteroposterior value was higher with higher age. Preoperative duration did not affect the severity of symptoms or signs. Patients with more pronounced stenosis tended to have a more severe reduction of walking ability. There was no correlation between symptoms and signs and radiographically detected constriction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9431629     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  40 in total

1.  Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment.

Authors:  Hasan Oğuz; Funda Levendoğlu; Tunç Cevat Oğün; Aysenur Tantuğ
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method.

Authors:  Guen Young Lee; Young Lee Guen; Joon Woo Lee; Woo Lee Joon; Hee Seok Choi; Seok Choi Hee; Kyoung-Jin Oh; Oh Kyoung-Jin; Heung Sik Kang; Sik Kang Heung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians.

Authors:  Shay Shabat; Zeev Arinzon; Yoram Folman; Josef Leitner; Rami David; Evgeny Pevzner; Reuven Gepstein; Ilya Pekarsky; Ishay Shuval
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbar nerve root occupancy in the foramen in achondroplasia: a morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Seung Woo Suh; Hae-Ryong Song; Jae Hyuk Yang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The analysis of the factors affecting lumbar spinal stenosis in adult patients.

Authors:  H Kaptan; M Ilhan; K Cakiroglu; O Kasimcan; C Kilic
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Effects of calcitonin on lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Peng; Long Chen; Jing Peng; Fei Xing; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

7.  Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls.

Authors:  Christy C Tomkins-Lane; Sara Christensen Holz; Karen S Yamakawa; Vaishali V Phalke; Doug J Quint; Jennifer Miner; Andrew J Haig
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing central lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  H-J Park; S S Kim; Y-J Lee; S-Y Lee; N-H Park; Y-J Choi; E-C Chung; M-H Rho
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.

Authors:  J F Zucherman; K Y Hsu; C A Hartjen; T F Mehalic; D A Implicito; M J Martin; D R Johnson; G A Skidmore; P P Vessa; J W Dwyer; S Puccio; J C Cauthen; R M Ozuna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Spine imaging after lumbar disc replacement: pitfalls and current recommendations.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Bengt Sandén
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2009-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.