Literature DB >> 9431423

The medical specialist: information gateway or gatekeeper for the family practitioner.

R Cullen1.   

Abstract

The medical specialist emerged as a critical gatekeeper in a study of information sources used by family practitioners in New Zealand. Thirty-four practitioners in the Wellington region were interviewed and their responses examined to ascertain the extent to which five criteria influenced their choice of information sources for clinical decision-making. The criteria were availability, searchability, understandability, credibility, and applicability. Of three major information sources investigated (textbooks, colleagues, and medical specialists), textbooks were consulted most frequently but were rated less valuable than colleagues and specialists as a source of information. The medical specialist was identified as the information source that best meets the five criteria. Thus, specialists play an important role in disseminating information to family practitioners. However, female practitioners included in the study were less likely to approach specialists than were their male counterparts. Physicians made little use of medical libraries to support clinical decision-making. The apparent disadvantage of female practitioners in accessing specialists needs to be addressed by professional associations. Medical librarians seeking to improve the access of family practitioners to recent literature should consider the heavy use made of specialists as a source of information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9431423      PMCID: PMC226291     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  6 in total

1.  Information-seeking strategies and differences among primary care physicians.

Authors:  L D Gruppen; F M Wolf; C Van Voorhees; J K Stross
Journal:  Mobius       Date:  1987

2.  Knowledge resource preferences of family physicians.

Authors:  D P Connelly; E C Rich; S P Curley; J T Kelly
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  The gatekeeper controversy: why it exists and how it can be resolved.

Authors:  N Glasgow
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1996-05-10

4.  Physicians as gatekeepers. A complex challenge.

Authors:  M D Reagan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Use of information sources by family physicians: a literature survey.

Authors:  A A Verhoeven; E J Boerma; B Meyboom-de Jong
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1995-01

6.  Family practice and the gatekeeper role.

Authors:  J P Geyman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 0.493

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication.

Authors:  Alla Keselman; Robert Logan; Catherine Arnott Smith; Gondy Leroy; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  The basis for using the Internet to support the information needs of primary care.

Authors:  E E Westberg; R A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Factors affecting influential discussions among physicians: a social network analysis of a primary care practice.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; John Z Ayanian; Paul D Cleary; Peter V Marsden
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  In search of evidence: family practitioners' use of the Internet for clinical information.

Authors:  Rowena J Cullen
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-10

5.  A social network analysis of treatment discoveries in cancer.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsalatsanis; Laura Barnes; Iztok Hozo; John Skvoretz; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The information sources and journals consulted or read by UK paediatricians to inform their clinical practice and those which they consider important: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Teresa H Jones; Steve Hanney; Martin J Buxton
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  A social network analysis on clinical education of diabetic foot.

Authors:  Mostafa Shokoohi; Saharnaz Nedjat; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2013-09-20

Review 8.  Learning from the problems of problem-based learning.

Authors:  Richard J Epstein
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.