M Tiggemann1, E Wilson-Barrett. 1. Department of Psychology, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have used figure ratings to demonstrate substantially greater body dissatisfaction among women than men. The present study aimed to investigate gender differences in body dissatisfaction in younger children. METHOD: A children's version of the Figure Rating Scale was administered to 140 children between the ages of 7 and 12 years. Children also completed measures of self-esteem and negative stereotyping of fat people. RESULTS: Irrespective of age, girls rated their ideal figure as smaller than the one they considered most attractive to boys, and as substantially smaller than their current figure. For boys, there was no difference in ratings. Level of body dissatisfaction correlated negatively with self-esteem and positively with negative stereotyping for boys, but not for girls. DISCUSSION: The results are consistent with body dissatisfaction being "a normative discontent" for young girls as well as for adult women.
OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have used figure ratings to demonstrate substantially greater body dissatisfaction among women than men. The present study aimed to investigate gender differences in body dissatisfaction in younger children. METHOD: A children's version of the Figure Rating Scale was administered to 140 children between the ages of 7 and 12 years. Children also completed measures of self-esteem and negative stereotyping of fat people. RESULTS: Irrespective of age, girls rated their ideal figure as smaller than the one they considered most attractive to boys, and as substantially smaller than their current figure. For boys, there was no difference in ratings. Level of body dissatisfaction correlated negatively with self-esteem and positively with negative stereotyping for boys, but not for girls. DISCUSSION: The results are consistent with body dissatisfaction being "a normative discontent" for young girls as well as for adult women.
Authors: Kirsten E Bevelander; Doeschka J Anschütz; Daan H M Creemers; Marloes Kleinjan; Rutger C M E Engels Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240