Literature DB >> 9428610

Tumor cytogenetics revisited: comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping.

T Ried1, M Liyanage, S du Manoir, K Heselmeyer, G Auer, M Macville, E Schröck.   

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques allow the visualization and localization of DNA target sequences on the chromosomal and cellular level and have evolved as exceedingly valuable tools in basic chromosome research and cytogenetic diagnostics. Recent advances in molecular cytogenetic approaches, namely comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping, now allow tumor genomes to be surveyed for chromosomal aberrations in a single experiment and permit identification of tumor-specific chromosomal aberrations with unprecedented accuracy. Comparative genomic hybridization utilizes the hybridization of differentially labeled tumor and reference DNA to generate a map of DNA copy number changes in tumor genomes. Comparative genomic hybridization is an ideal tool for analyzing chromosomal imbalances in archived tumor material and for examining possible correlations between these findings and tumor phenotypes. Spectral karyotyping is based on the simultaneous hybridization of differentially labeled chromosome painting probes (24 in human), followed by spectral imaging that allows the unique display of all human (and other species) chromosomes in different colors. Spectral karyotyping greatly facilitates the characterization of numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations, therefore improving karyotype analysis considerably. We review these new molecular cytogenetic concepts, describe applications of comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping for the visualization of chromosomal aberrations as they relate to human malignancies and animal models thereof, and provide evidence that fluorescence in situ hybridization has developed as a robust and reliable technique which justifies its translation to cytogenetic diagnostics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9428610     DOI: 10.1007/s001090050169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)        ISSN: 0946-2716            Impact factor:   4.599


  15 in total

1.  Quantifying single gene copy number by measuring fluorescent probe lengths on combed genomic DNA.

Authors:  J Herrick; X Michalet; C Conti; C Schurra; A Bensimon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Microscopy and image analysis.

Authors:  George McNamara; Michael J Difilippantonio; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08

Review 3.  Interphase cytogenetics and its role in molecular diagnostics of solid tumors.

Authors:  T Ried
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  The consequences of chromosomal aneuploidy on the transcriptome of cancer cells.

Authors:  Thomas Ried; Yue Hu; Michael J Difilippantonio; B Michael Ghadimi; Marian Grade; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-03-06

5.  Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  James Hicks; Alexander Krasnitz; B Lakshmi; Nicholas E Navin; Michael Riggs; Evan Leibu; Diane Esposito; Joan Alexander; Jen Troge; Vladimir Grubor; Seungtai Yoon; Michael Wigler; Kenny Ye; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Bjørn Naume; Ellen Schlicting; Larry Norton; Torsten Hägerström; Lambert Skoog; Gert Auer; Susanne Månér; Pär Lundin; Anders Zetterberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Spectral karyotyping to study chromosome abnormalities in humans and mice with polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Wissam A AbouAlaiwi; Ingrid Rodriguez; Surya M Nauli
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Rearrangements of the telomeric region of mouse chromosome 11 in Pre-B ABL/MYC cells revealed by mBANDing, spectral karyotyping, and fluorescence in-situ hybridization with a subtelomeric probe.

Authors:  Katalin Benedek; Ilse Chudoba; George Klein; Francis Wiener; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Specific chromosomal aberrations and amplification of the AIB1 nuclear receptor coactivator gene in pancreatic carcinomas.

Authors:  B M Ghadimi; E Schröck; R L Walker; D Wangsa; A Jauho; P S Meltzer; T Ried
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Construction of oncogenetic tree models reveals multiple pathways of oral cancer progression.

Authors:  Swapnali Pathare; Alejandro A Schäffer; Niko Beerenwinkel; Manoj Mahimkar
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Relevance and safety of telomerase for human tissue engineering.

Authors:  Rebecca Y Klinger; Juliana L Blum; Bevin Hearn; Benjamin Lebow; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.