Literature DB >> 9428033

Performance in quiet and in noise with the Nucleus Spectra 22 and the Clarion CIS/CA cochlear implant devices.

R D Battmer1, J M Reid, T Lenarz.   

Abstract

The demographic characteristics and functional results from two cochlear implant adult patient groups are reported. The first group of subjects, implanted with the Nucleus Mini 22 Cochlear Implant System utilized the SPEAK coding strategy available in the SPECTRA 22 speech processor. The second group of subjects, implanted with the Clarion Cochlear Implant System used the CIS coding strategy with the exception of one patient utilizing the CA speech coding strategy. Data are available for 130 Nucleus subjects who were evaluated following 1 month of use of the SPEAK coding strategy. Data for the second group of subjects became available following administration of the Nucleus test battery to 38 Clarion subjects with varying implant experience. The test results presented include one common open set speech perception measure for all patients, the Freiburger monosyllabic word (FMW) tests. Additional subsequent test measures were taken from an adaptive test protocol assessing performance in quiet and quiet and two noise conditions. The results of this study conclude that both subject groups displayed similar distribution of performance scores on Freiburger Monosyllabic Words despite the large difference in group numbers. Both device groups also demonstrated a similar degree of deterioration in performance with increased background noise. This paper describes the results observed for each group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9428033     DOI: 10.3109/01050399709048014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  4 in total

1.  Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of technology and testing environment on speech perception using telehealth with cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Jenny L Goehring; Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Daniel L Valente; Ryan W McCreery; Gina R Diaz; Todd Sanford; Roger Harpster
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolai Bernhard; Ulrich Gauger; Eugenia Romo Ventura; Florian C Uecker; Heidi Olze; Steffen Knopke; Toni Hänsel; Annekatrin Coordes
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Evaluation of speech perception in noise in cochlear implanted adults.

Authors:  Leandra Tabanez do Nascimento; Maria Cecília Bevilacqua
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-12-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.