Literature DB >> 9426729

Color Doppler ultrasound criteria to diagnose varicoceles: correlation of a new scoring system with physical examination.

R K Chiou1, J C Anderson, R K Wobig, D E Rosinsky, A Matamoros, W S Chen, R J Taylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) diagnostic criteria for varicoceles are poorly defined, and the role of CDU in diagnosing varicoceles is controversial. The purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CDU for varicoceles compared to physical examination.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 64 patients with CDU and collected the following data: maximum diameter of scrotal veins, the presence of a venous plexus, sum of the diameter of up to six veins of the plexus, and the duration and amplitude of flow change on Valsalva maneuver. To avoid interphysician variation, all patients were examined by one designated senior urologist with the sonographer remaining unaware of the findings.
RESULTS: CDU parameters of 127 testis units in 64 patients were analyzed and compared to the physical findings. Fifty-nine testis units were positive and 57 units were negative for varicocele on physical examination. In 11 testis units, results of physical examination were inconclusive regarding the presence of varicocele. The commonly accepted CDU criterion for varicocele (maximal vein diameter of 3 mm or greater) had a sensitivity of 53% and specificity of 91% compared to physical examination. We developed a new scoring system incorporating the maximal venous diameter (score 0 to 3), the presence of a venous plexus and the sum of the diameters of veins in the plexus (score 0 to 3), and the change of flow on Valsalva maneuver (score 0 to 3). Using a total score of 4 or more to define the presence of CDU-positive varicocele, we observed a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 85% when compared to physical examination. All moderate to large varicoceles found on physical examination were positive by CDU diagnosis using the scoring system, but the same group had only a 68% positive rate by traditional CDU diagnostic criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the proposed new scoring system, CDU has been shown to be a reliable and accurate method of diagnosis for varicoceles compared to the current reference standard physical examination. CDU has the advantages of being able to objectively examine venous plexus and measure blood flow parameters and to be less observer-dependent than physical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9426729     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00452-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  30 in total

1.  Assessment of sapheno-femoral junction continence in patients with primary adolescent varicocoele.

Authors:  Mirace Yasemin Karadeniz-Bilgili; Halil Basar; Ilknur Simsir; Birsen Unal; Ertan Batislam
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-07-18

2.  Ultrasound evaluation of varicoceles: guidelines and recommendations of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESUR-SPIWG) for detection, classification, and grading.

Authors:  Simon Freeman; Michele Bertolotto; Jonathan Richenberg; Jane Belfield; Vikram Dogra; Dean Y Huang; Francesco Lotti; Karolina Markiet; Olivera Nikolic; Subramaniyan Ramanathan; Parvati Ramchandani; Laurence Rocher; Mustafa Secil; Paul S Sidhu; Katarzyna Skrobisz; Michal Studniarek; Athina Tsili; Ahmet Tuncay Turgut; Pietro Pavlica; Lorenzo E Derchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A rare testicular vein anatomical variant contributes to right-sided varicocoele formation and leads to the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  James William Ryan; Gavin Sugrue; Sandra Graham; Carmel Cronin
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-13

4.  Clinical grading and color Doppler ultrasonography-based grading of varicocele: how compatible are the two grading systems?

Authors:  Amin Abolhasani Foroughi; Ehsan Yazdanpanah; Masoume Nazeri; Tannaz Eghbali; Peyman Arasteh; Ali Ariafar
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Comparison of Sperm Parameters in Patients with Infertility Induced by Genital Infection versus Varicocele.

Authors:  Bogdan Pajovic; Antonio Dimitrovski; Nemanja Radojevic; Marko Vukovic
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.021

Review 6.  Imaging and interventional therapy for varicoceles.

Authors:  No Kwak; David Siegel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Efficacy of scrotal Doppler ultrasonography with the Valsalva maneuver, standing position, and resting-Valsalva ratio for varicocele diagnosis.

Authors:  Yoo Seok Kim; Soon Ki Kim; In-Chang Cho; Seung Ki Min
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-30

8.  Imaging in male-factor obstructive infertility.

Authors:  Ragab H Donkol
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-28

Review 9.  Color Doppler ultrasound investigation of varicocele.

Authors:  Giovanni Liguori; Carlo Trombetta; Giulio Garaffa; Stefano Bucci; Ignazio Gattuccio; Leonardo Salamè; Emanuele Belgrano
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Children and adults varicocele: diagnostic issues and therapeutical strategies.

Authors:  Massimo Valentino; Michele Bertolotto; Lorenzo Derchi; Pietro Pavlica
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.