A Raboy1, G Ferzli, P Albert. 1. Department of Urology, Staten Island University Hospital, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We report our initial experience using laparoscopic instruments and techniques in the performance of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) through an entirely extraperitoneal endoscopic (EE) approach. METHODS: A 62-year-old man with a Gleason score of 7 and clinical stage T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent EERRP. The procedure was evaluated for achievement of removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles and for complete vesicourethral anastomosis. Operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and pathologic findings were also evaluated. RESULTS: Complete endoscopic removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles was achieved. Endoscopic reconstruction of the bladder neck with a watertight anastomosis was successful. Operative time was 5 hours and 45 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 600 cc. Hospital stay was 2.5 days. Final pathologic evaluation was a Gleason score of 7 and Stage T2 disease with negative margins. CONCLUSIONS: The initial experience for EERRP is encouraging. Further evaluation to refine the technique and determine its efficacy and role in treating prostate cancer is in order.
OBJECTIVES: We report our initial experience using laparoscopic instruments and techniques in the performance of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) through an entirely extraperitoneal endoscopic (EE) approach. METHODS: A 62-year-old man with a Gleason score of 7 and clinical stage T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent EERRP. The procedure was evaluated for achievement of removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles and for complete vesicourethral anastomosis. Operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and pathologic findings were also evaluated. RESULTS: Complete endoscopic removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles was achieved. Endoscopic reconstruction of the bladder neck with a watertight anastomosis was successful. Operative time was 5 hours and 45 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 600 cc. Hospital stay was 2.5 days. Final pathologic evaluation was a Gleason score of 7 and Stage T2 disease with negative margins. CONCLUSIONS: The initial experience for EERRP is encouraging. Further evaluation to refine the technique and determine its efficacy and role in treating prostate cancer is in order.
Authors: J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss; R Rabenalt; M Do; H Pfeiffer; A Bekos; J Neuhaus; C G Stief; U Jonas; W Dorschner Journal: Urologe A Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Murilo A Luz; Alan Dal Pra; Hin-Yu Vincent Tu; Marie Duclos; Fabio L B Cury; Bassel G Bachir; Armen G Aprikian; Simon Tanguay; Wassim Kassouf Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.862