Literature DB >> 9426033

Outcome after normal exercise echocardiography and predictors of subsequent cardiac events: follow-up of 1,325 patients.

R B McCully1, V L Roger, D W Mahoney, B L Karon, J K Oh, F A Miller, J B Seward, P A Pellikka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the outcome of a large group of patients after normal exercise echocardiography and to identify potential predictors of subsequent cardiac events.
BACKGROUND: Earlier studies suggested that prognosis after normal exercise echocardiography is favorable, with a low subsequent cardiac event rate. These studies involved a small number of patients and did not have sufficient statistical power to stratify risk.
METHODS: The outcomes of 1,325 patients who had normal exercise echocardiograms were examined. End points were overall and cardiac event-free survival. Cardiac events were defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization. Patient characteristics were analyzed in relation to time to first cardiac event in a univariate and multivariate manner to determine which, if any, were associated with an increased hazard of subsequent cardiac events.
RESULTS: Overall survival of the study group was significantly better than that of an age- and gender-matched group obtained from life tables (p < 0.0001). The cardiac event-free survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 99.2%, 97.8% and 97.4%, respectively. The cardiac event rate per person-year of follow-up was 0.9%. Subgroups with an intermediate or high pretest probability of having coronary artery disease also had low cardiac event rates. Multivariate predictors of subsequent cardiac events were angina during treadmill exercise testing (risk ratio [RR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 11.0), low work load (defined as < 7 metabolic equivalents [METs] for men and < 5 METs for women; RR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4 to 7.6), echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (RR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.3) and advancing age (RR 1.04/year, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.1).
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome after normal exercise echocardiography is excellent. Subgroups with an intermediate or high pretest probability of having coronary artery disease also have a favorable prognosis after a normal exercise echocardiogram. Characteristics predictive of subsequent cardiac events (i.e., patient age, work load, angina during exercise testing and echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy) should be considered in the clinical interpretation of a normal exercise echocardiogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9426033     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00427-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  30 in total

1.  Post-myocardial infarction risk stratification with stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging versus echocardiography: separate but not equal.

Authors:  K A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Clinical and economic outcomes assessment with myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  L J Shaw; M J Monaghan; P Nihoyannopolous
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment.

Authors:  M Pakkal; V Raj; G P McCann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Synergistic effect of coronary artery disease risk factors on long-term survival in patients with normal exercise SPECT studies.

Authors:  Azhar Supariwala; Seth Uretsky; Padmakshi Singh; Salim Memon; Surinder S Khokhar; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Prashanth Atluri; Joseph Hersh; Hari K Koppuravuri; Alan Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  R Senior; M Monaghan; H Becher; J Mayet; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Incidence and predictors of acute coronary syndrome within a year following a negative stress test-a false sense of security: is routine screening any useful?

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Hemnishil K Marella; Jayna Kelly; Amit Nanda; William Paul Skelton; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

8.  Implications of Abnormal Exercise Electrocardiography With Normal Stress Echocardiography.

Authors:  Melissa A Daubert; Joseph Sivak; Allison Dunning; Pamela S Douglas; Brian Coyne; Tracy Y Wang; Daniel B Mark; Eric J Velazquez
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Comparison of treadmill exercise stress cardiac MRI to stress echocardiography in healthy volunteers for adequacy of left ventricular endocardial wall visualization: A pilot study.

Authors:  Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan; Jennifer A Dickerson; Debbie Scandling; Vijay Balasubramanian; Michael L Pennell; Alice Hinton; Subha V Raman; Orlando P Simonetti
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.