Literature DB >> 9425546

Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: a strategy employed by V1?

B A Olshausen1, D J Field.   

Abstract

The spatial receptive fields of simple cells in mammalian striate cortex have been reasonably well described physiologically and can be characterized as being localized, oriented, and bandpass, comparable with the basis functions of wavelet transforms. Previously, we have shown that these receptive field properties may be accounted for in terms of a strategy for producing a sparse distribution of output activity in response to natural images. Here, in addition to describing this work in a more expansive fashion, we examine the neurobiological implications of sparse coding. Of particular interest is the case when the code is overcomplete--i.e., when the number of code elements is greater than the effective dimensionality of the input space. Because the basis functions are non-orthogonal and not linearly independent of each other, sparsifying the code will recruit only those basis functions necessary for representing a given input, and so the input-output function will deviate from being purely linear. These deviations from linearity provide a potential explanation for the weak forms of non-linearity observed in the response properties of cortical simple cells, and they further make predictions about the expected interactions among units in response to naturalistic stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9425546     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00169-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  223 in total

1.  Independent component analysis of temporal sequences subject to constraints by lateral geniculate nucleus inputs yields all the three major cell types of the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  B Szatmáry; A Lorincz
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Natural stimulation of the nonclassical receptive field increases information transmission efficiency in V1.

Authors:  William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Bayesian natural selection and the evolution of perceptual systems.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler; Randy L Diehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The mystery of structure and function of sensory processing areas of the neocortex: a resolution.

Authors:  András Lorincz; Botond Szatmáry; Gábor Szirtes
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons.

Authors:  Stephen V David; William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Role of homeostasis in learning sparse representations.

Authors:  Laurent U Perrinet
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  A general rule for sensory cue summation: evidence from photographic, musical, phonetic and cross-modal stimuli.

Authors:  M P S To; R J Baddeley; T Troscianko; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Multimap formation in visual cortex.

Authors:  Rishabh Jain; Rachel Millin; Bartlett W Mel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Rapid Bayesian learning in the mammalian olfactory system.

Authors:  Naoki Hiratani; Peter E Latham
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Small Networks Encode Decision-Making in Primary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; Daniel E Winkowski; Alireza Sheikhattar; Kevin Armengol; Behtash Babadi; Patrick O Kanold
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.