Literature DB >> 20235818

Role of homeostasis in learning sparse representations.

Laurent U Perrinet1.   

Abstract

Neurons in the input layer of primary visual cortex in primates develop edge-like receptive fields. One approach to understanding the emergence of this response is to state that neural activity has to efficiently represent sensory data with respect to the statistics of natural scenes. Furthermore, it is believed that such an efficient coding is achieved using a competition across neurons so as to generate a sparse representation, that is, where a relatively small number of neurons are simultaneously active. Indeed, different models of sparse coding, coupled with Hebbian learning and homeostasis, have been proposed that successfully match the observed emergent response. However, the specific role of homeostasis in learning such sparse representations is still largely unknown. By quantitatively assessing the efficiency of the neural representation during learning, we derive a cooperative homeostasis mechanism that optimally tunes the competition between neurons within the sparse coding algorithm. We apply this homeostasis while learning small patches taken from natural images and compare its efficiency with state-of-the-art algorithms. Results show that while different sparse coding algorithms give similar coding results, the homeostasis provides an optimal balance for the representation of natural images within the population of neurons. Competition in sparse coding is optimized when it is fair. By contributing to optimizing statistical competition across neurons, homeostasis is crucial in providing a more efficient solution to the emergence of independent components.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20235818      PMCID: PMC2929690          DOI: 10.1162/neco.2010.05-08-795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  30 in total

1.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization.

Authors:  D D Lee; H S Seung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The Role of Horizontal Connections in Generating Long Receptive Fields in the Cat Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Jürgen Bolz; Charles D. Gilbert
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Early cortical orientation selectivity: how fast inhibition decodes the order of spike latencies.

Authors:  A Delorme
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Robust coding over noisy overcomplete channels.

Authors:  Eizaburo Doi; Doru C Balcan; Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  Efficient auditory coding.

Authors:  Evan C Smith; Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Adaptive regulation of sparseness by feedforward inhibition.

Authors:  Collins Assisi; Mark Stopfer; Gilles Laurent; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  A sparse generative model of V1 simple cells with intrinsic plasticity.

Authors:  Cornelius Weber; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Neural population coding is optimized by discrete tuning curves.

Authors:  Alexander P Nikitin; Nigel G Stocks; Robert P Morse; Mark D McDonnell
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images.

Authors:  B A Olshausen; D J Field
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of early vision.

Authors:  J H Van Hateren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  8 in total

1.  Motion-based prediction is sufficient to solve the aperture problem.

Authors:  Laurent U Perrinet; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  A sparse coding model with synaptically local plasticity and spiking neurons can account for the diverse shapes of V1 simple cell receptive fields.

Authors:  Joel Zylberberg; Jason Timothy Murphy; Michael Robert DeWeese
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Stability of Neuronal Networks with Homeostatic Regulation.

Authors:  Daniel Harnack; Miha Pelko; Antoine Chaillet; Yacine Chitour; Mark C W van Rossum
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Visual nonclassical receptive field effects emerge from sparse coding in a dynamical system.

Authors:  Mengchen Zhu; Christopher J Rozell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Sparse coding models can exhibit decreasing sparseness while learning sparse codes for natural images.

Authors:  Joel Zylberberg; Michael Robert DeWeese
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The HTM Spatial Pooler-A Neocortical Algorithm for Online Sparse Distributed Coding.

Authors:  Yuwei Cui; Subutai Ahmad; Jeff Hawkins
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  An Adaptive Homeostatic Algorithm for the Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features.

Authors:  Laurent U Perrinet
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-16

8.  Role of the site of synaptic competition and the balance of learning forces for Hebbian encoding of probabilistic Markov sequences.

Authors:  Kristofer E Bouchard; Surya Ganguli; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.380

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.