Literature DB >> 9424990

Number needed to treat and relative risk reduction.

B P Jain.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9424990     DOI： 10.7326/0003-4819-128-1-199801010-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN： 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Can facts trump unconditional trust? Evidence-based information halves the influence of physicians' non-evidence-based cancer screening recommendations.

Authors:  Odette Wegwarth; Gert G Wagner; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  When evidence says no: gynaecologists' reasons for (not) recommending ineffective ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  Odette Wegwarth; Nora Pashayan
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  US gynecologists' estimates and beliefs regarding ovarian cancer screening's effectiveness 5 years after release of the PLCO evidence.

Authors:  Odette Wegwarth; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Experiencing the risk of overutilising opioids among patients with chronic non-cancer pain in ambulatory care (ERONA): the protocol of an exploratory, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Odette Wegwarth; Claudia Spies; Erika Schulte; Joerg J Meerpohl; Christine Schmucker; Edris Nury; Dirk Brockmann; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Stefan Wind; Eva Goebel; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries.

Authors:  Odette Wegwarth; Martin Widschwendter; David Cibula; Karin Sundström; Rosalba Portuesi; Ines Lein; Felix G Rebitschek
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.692
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.