Literature DB >> 9422979

The use of digital images in pathology.

P N Furness1.   

Abstract

Digital images are routinely used by the publishing industry, but most diagnostic pathologists are unfamiliar with the technology and its possibilities. This review aims to explain the basic principles of digital image acquisition, storage, manipulation and use, and the possibilities provided not only in research, but also in teaching and in routine diagnostic pathology. Images of natural objects are usually expressed digitally as 'bitmaps'--rectilinear arrays of small dots. The size of each dot can vary, but so can its information content in terms, for example, of colour, greyscale or opacity. Various file formats and compression algorithms are available. Video cameras connected to microscopes are familiar to most pathologists; video images can be converted directly to a digital form by a suitably equipped computer. Digital cameras and scanners are alternative acquisition tools of relevance to pathologists. Once acquired, a digital image can easily be subjected to the digital equivalent of any conventional darkroom manipulation and modern software allows much more flexibility, to such an extent that a new tool for scientific fraud has been created. For research, image enhancement and analysis is an increasingly powerful and affordable tool. Morphometric measurements are, after many predictions, at last beginning to be part of the toolkit of the diagnostic pathologist. In teaching, the potential to create dramatic yet informative presentations is demonstrated daily by the publishing industry; such methods are readily applicable to the classroom. The combination of digital images and the Internet raises many possibilities; for example, instead of seeking one expert diagnostic opinion, one could simultaneously seek the opinion of many, all around the globe. It is inevitable that in the coming years the use of digital images will spread from the laboratory to the medical curriculum and to the whole of diagnostic pathology.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9422979     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199711)183:3<253::AID-PATH927>3.0.CO;2-P

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  14 in total

1.  A surgical pathology system for gross specimen examination.

Authors:  D Cruz; M Seixas
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  HIV target cells in Schistosoma haematobium-infected female genital mucosa.

Authors:  Peter Mark Jourdan; Sigve Dhondup Holmen; Svein Gunnar Gundersen; Borghild Roald; Eyrun Floerecke Kjetland
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  The use of digital imaging, video conferencing, and telepathology in histopathology: a national survey.

Authors:  T Dennis; R D Start; S S Cross
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  [Digital slide training portal. Training slides available on the Internet from the German division of the IAP].

Authors:  K Saeger; D Schmidt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Observer variability in the interpretation of HER2/neu immunohistochemical expression with unaided and computer-aided digital microscopy.

Authors:  Marios A Gavrielides; Brandon D Gallas; Petra Lenz; Aldo Badano; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Semiquantitative and semi-automated morphometric evaluation of chronic lesions in renal biopsies.

Authors:  Daniel Abensur Athanazio; Gloria Maria Maranhão Sweet; Carlos Alberto Silva; Washington Luis Conrado dos-Santos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Comparison between digital and optical microscopy: Analysis in a mouse gut inflammation model.

Authors:  Airton Pereira E Silva; Sylvia Maria Nicolau Campos; Isabelle Mazza Guimarães; Gerlinde Agate Platais Brasil Teixeira
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-07-21

8.  Transcontinental communication and quantitative digital histopathology via the Internet; with special reference to prostate neoplasia.

Authors:  R Montironi; D Thompson; M Scarpelli; H G Bartels; P W Hamilton; V D da Silva; W A Sakr; B Weyn; A van Daele; P H Bartels
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images.

Authors:  Douglas W Cromey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Histopathologic features aid in predicting risk for progression of IgA nephropathy.

Authors:  Michael Walsh; Aylin Sar; Diane Lee; Serdar Yilmaz; Hallgrimur Benediktsson; Braden Manns; Brenda Hemmelgarn
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.