Literature DB >> 9420791

Coronary angiographic rates after stress single-photon emission computed tomographic scintigraphy.

T M Bateman1, J H O'Keefe, V M Dong, C Barnhart, R W Ligon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is speculation that coronary angiography may be overused for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Because of its proved ability to differentiate high- and low-risk subsets of patients with coronary artery disease, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy should be an effective strategy in patient selection for angiography. This retrospective clinical study analyzed the relation between scintigraphic findings and subsequent angiography. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Coronary angiographic rates were determined by following up on all stress single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) myocardial perfusion studies performed in a cardiology practice nuclear laboratory during a 26-month interval. All patients were followed up for at least 3 months; mean follow-up was 8.9 months. Subsequent angiography was determined from catheterization laboratory logs, medical records, and telephone contact. Scintigraphic studies were graded according to presence or absence of reversible perfusion defects, affected coronary territories, and lung uptake of 201Tl. Scans were categorized high risk if more than two of the following three criteria were met: reversibility of left anterior descending or multivessel distributions or abnormal lung uptake of thallium. Of 4162 studies, 60% had reversible perfusion defects. Of such studies, 32% were followed up by angiography versus 3.5% without reversible defects. Among studies with reversible defects, the subsequent angiography rate was 60% for those showing high-risk reversibility, compared with 9% for all other studies demonstrating reversibility. Multivariate logistic regression identified high-risk reversibility (odds ratio 20.96) and any reversibility (odds ratio 8.22) as the strongest predictors of angiography. Other correlates of lesser statistical significance were angina and absence of prior infarction or coronary bypass.
CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective study, the results of SPECT scintigraphy overpowered all other clinical and treadmill characteristics in determining the likelihood of subsequent coronary angiography. Only rarely were patients categorized as relatively low risk by scintigraphy referred for angiography. As such, SPECT scintigraphy as used in a private practice, self-referral environment appears to be effective in stratifying potential candidates for coronary angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9420791     DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(05)80058-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  22 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological (stress) perfusion scintigraphy: methods, advantages, and applications.

Authors:  T M Bateman; J H O'Keefe
Journal:  Am J Card Imaging       Date:  1992-03

2.  Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts.

Authors:  E G DePuey; E V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. A diagnostic tool comes of age.

Authors:  K A Brown
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as predictors of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M L Ladenheim; B H Pollock; A Rozanski; D S Berman; H M Staniloff; J S Forrester; G A Diamond
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Lung thallium-201 uptake after stress testing in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  F G Kushner; R D Okada; H D Kirshenbaum; C A Boucher; H W Strauss; G M Pohost
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Ordering patterns and clinical impact of cardiovascular nuclear medicine procedures.

Authors:  L Goldman; A R Feinstein; W P Batsford; L S Cohen; A Gottschalk; B L Zaret
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Results of a second-opinion trial among patients recommended for coronary angiography.

Authors:  T B Graboys; B Biegelsen; S Lampert; C M Blatt; B Lown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Computerized cranial tomography. Effect on diagnostic and therapeutic plans.

Authors:  H V Fineberg; R Bauman; M Sosman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Adenosine thallium-201 is superior to exercise thallium-201 for detecting coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  J H O'Keefe; T M Bateman; C S Barnhart
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  The appropriateness of use of coronary angiography in New York State.

Authors:  S J Bernstein; L H Hilborne; L L Leape; M E Fiske; R E Park; C J Kamberg; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  30 in total

1.  Post-myocardial infarction risk stratification with stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging versus echocardiography: separate but not equal.

Authors:  K A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Cardiac risk defined by stress myocardial perfusion imaging: Impact on physician decision making and cost savings.

Authors:  Kenneth A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Challenges and strategies in the provision of high-quality nuclear cardiology imaging services in office-based cardiology practice.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Gregory S Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Assessment of prognosis in chronic coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T M Bateman; E Prvulovich
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in a study population without post-test referral bias.

Authors:  Allan Johansen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Henrik Wulff Christensen; Werner Vach; Henrik Boel Jørgensen; Annegrete Veje; Torben Haghfelt
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  A normal stress SPECT scan is an effective gatekeeper for coronary angiography.

Authors:  Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; James J Milavetz; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Implications of nuclear cardiology as a gatekeeper.

Authors:  B L Zaret
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Assessing the prognostic implications of myocardial perfusion studies: identification of patients at risk vs patients who may benefit from intervention?

Authors:  Paul Cremer; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Stress single photon emission computed tomography for detection of coronary artery disease and risk stratification of asymptomatic patients at moderate risk.

Authors:  Masud H Khandaker; Todd D Miller; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; J Wells Askew; David O Hodge; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman; Aiden Abidov; Xingping Kang; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Maria G Sciammarella; Ishac Cohen; James Gerlach; Parker B Waechter; Guido Germano; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.