BACKGROUND: To assess the accuracy of rest and treadmill exercise first-pass radionuclide ventriculographic measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 40 patients underwent treadmill exercise first-pass and bicycle exercise equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography. To determine the frequency of technically adequate treadmill exercise first-pass studies, an additional 128 consecutive patients undergoing treadmill exercise first-pass procedures during stress 99mTc-labeled sestamibi myocardial perfusion studies were assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The treadmill exercise first-pass procedure used a multicrystal camera and an 241Am point source to allow for correction of patient motion. Excellent correlations were observed between resting first-pass and resting equilibrium LVEF (r = 0.91; standard error of the estimate = 5.6). A high correlation was also observed between treadmill exercise first-pass and bicycle equilibrium exercise LVEF measurements (r = 0.85, standard error of the estimate = 7.6). Treadmill first-pass LVEF systematically underestimated the bicycle equilibrium LVEF. Intraobserver agreement for rest and exercise first-pass LVEF was high (r values of 0.98 and 0.94, respectively). Of the 168 consecutive treadmill exercise first-pass studies evaluated for technical adequacy, 21 (12.5%) were deemed technically inadequate, with most of the sources of error being avoidable. The frequency of technically adequate studies was as high (87%) in high levels of exercise (Bruce stages 3 and 4) as in lower levels (88%). The findings of this study validate the first-pass treadmill exercise LVEF measurement. CONCLUSION: This procedure now provides the option for combining the information of peak treadmill exercise LVEF with measurements of exercise myocardial perfusion from the same injection of radioactivity.
BACKGROUND: To assess the accuracy of rest and treadmill exercise first-pass radionuclide ventriculographic measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 40 patients underwent treadmill exercise first-pass and bicycle exercise equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography. To determine the frequency of technically adequate treadmill exercise first-pass studies, an additional 128 consecutive patients undergoing treadmill exercise first-pass procedures during stress 99mTc-labeled sestamibi myocardial perfusion studies were assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The treadmill exercise first-pass procedure used a multicrystal camera and an 241Am point source to allow for correction of patient motion. Excellent correlations were observed between resting first-pass and resting equilibrium LVEF (r = 0.91; standard error of the estimate = 5.6). A high correlation was also observed between treadmill exercise first-pass and bicycle equilibrium exercise LVEF measurements (r = 0.85, standard error of the estimate = 7.6). Treadmill first-pass LVEF systematically underestimated the bicycle equilibrium LVEF. Intraobserver agreement for rest and exercise first-pass LVEF was high (r values of 0.98 and 0.94, respectively). Of the 168 consecutive treadmill exercise first-pass studies evaluated for technical adequacy, 21 (12.5%) were deemed technically inadequate, with most of the sources of error being avoidable. The frequency of technically adequate studies was as high (87%) in high levels of exercise (Bruce stages 3 and 4) as in lower levels (88%). The findings of this study validate the first-pass treadmill exercise LVEF measurement. CONCLUSION: This procedure now provides the option for combining the information of peak treadmill exercise LVEF with measurements of exercise myocardial perfusion from the same injection of radioactivity.
Authors: K L Lee; D B Pryor; K S Pieper; F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Mark; M A Hlatky; R E Coleman; F R Cobb; R H Jones Journal: Circulation Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman; Salvador Borges-Neto; Sean W Hayes; Lynne L Johnson; Kenneth J Nichols; Robert A Pagnanelli; Steven C Port Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Christopher L Hansen; Richard A Goldstein; Daniel S Berman; Keith B Churchwell; C David Cooke; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; Seth T Dahlberg; James R Galt; Ravi K Garg; Gary V Heller; Mark C Hyun; Lynne L Johnson; April Mann; Benjamin D McCallister; Raymond Taillefer; R Parker Ward; John J Mahmarian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: B Hesse; T B Lindhardt; W Acampa; C Anagnostopoulos; J Ballinger; J J Bax; L Edenbrandt; A Flotats; G Germano; T Gmeiner Stopar; P Franken; A Kelion; A Kjaer; D Le Guludec; M Ljungberg; A F Maenhout; C Marcassa; J Marving; F McKiddie; W M Schaefer; L Stegger; R Underwood Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: D Berman; G Germano; H Lewin; X Kang; P B Kavanagh; P Tapnio; M Harris; J Friedman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1998 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: B Benari; H Kiat; J Erel; M Hyun; F P Wang; C Williams; J D Friedman; G Germano; K F Van Train; D Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1995 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: S Borges-Neto; L J Shaw; K L Kesler; M W Hanson; E D Peterson; E I Morris; R E Coleman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1997 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: A Peix; A López; F Ponce; J Morales; A R de la Vega; C S Chesa; A M Maltas; D García-Barreto Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1998 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952