Literature DB >> 9419561

Selection of processing algorithms for digital image compression: a rank-order study.

J M Holbert1, M Staiger, T S Chang, J D Towers, C A Britton.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: We investigated non-receiver operating characteristic (non-ROC) methods for the selection of processing algorithms for digital image compression.
METHODS: We performed a multipoint, rank-order study with 20 posteroanterior chest images, each processed using four different algorithms. Seven radiologists reviewed these alongside the digitized noncompressed image. Observers were forced to rank order the similarity and/or difference of the processed images to the nonprocessed image in each case.
RESULTS: A two-way analysis of variance of the rankings was statistically significant (p = .025), indicating that one processing scheme yielded images that were clearly perceived as the most similar to the nonprocessed images. The selected processing scheme was not the one that yielded the lowest quantitative difference from the nonprocessed images as measured by root mean square error.
CONCLUSION: Non-ROC study designs that are highly sensitive to small differences among similar images can be used to select processing algorithms.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9419561     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(05)80183-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  2 in total

1.  Perceived fidelity of compressed and reconstructed radiological images: a preliminary exploration of compression, luminance, and viewing distance.

Authors:  T K Pilgram; R M Slone; E Muka; J R Cox; G J Blaine
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Forced choice and ordinal discrete rating assessment of image quality: a comparison.

Authors:  D Gur; D A Rubin; B H Kart; A M Peterson; C R Fuhrman; H E Rockette; J L King
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.