Literature DB >> 9419386

Deleterious mutation accumulation and the regeneration of genetic resources.

D J Schoen1, J L David, T M Bataillon.   

Abstract

The accumulation of mildly deleterious mutations accompanying recurrent regeneration of plant germ plasm was modeled under regeneration conditions characterized by different amounts of selection and genetic drift. Under some regeneration conditions (sample sizes >/=75 individuals and bulk harvesting of seed) mutation accumulation was negligible, but under others (sample sizes <75 individuals or equalization of seed production by individual plants) mutation numbers per genome increased significantly during 25-50 cycles of regeneration. When mutations also are assumed to occur (at elevated rates) during seed storage, significant mutation accumulation and fitness decline occurred in 10 or fewer cycles of regeneration regardless of the regeneration conditions. Calculations also were performed to determine the numbers of deleterious mutations introduced and remaining in the genome of an existing variety after hybridization with a genetic resource and subsequent backcrossing. The results suggest that mutation accumulation has the potential to reduce the viability of materials held in germ plasm collections and to offset gains expected by the introduction of particular genes of interest from genetic resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9419386      PMCID: PMC18235          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  Marker-assisted introgression in backcross breeding programs.

Authors:  P M Visscher; C S Haley; R Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild.

Authors:  S D Tanksley; S R McCouch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Detrimental genes with partial selfing and effects on a neutral locus.

Authors:  T Ota; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 4.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. V. Coupling-repulsion effect of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability.

Authors:  T Mukai; T Yamazaki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; D Houle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Evidence for the partial dominance of viability genes contributing to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  Y B Fu; K Ritland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. II. Facultative apomixis and selfing.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli.

Authors:  T T Kibota; M Lynch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  11 in total

1.  Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Patrick C Phillips; Dee R Denver; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Relaxation of selection with equalization of parental contributions in conservation programs: an experimental test with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S T Rodríguez-Ramilo; P Morán; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Shortcut predictions for fitness properties at the mutation-selection-drift balance and for its buildup after size reduction under different management strategies.

Authors:  Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Application of Reproduction Technologies to the Conservation of Genetic Resources.

Authors:  Enrique Santiago; Armando Caballero
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2000-12-18       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Aging in a long-lived clonal tree.

Authors:  Dilara Ally; Kermit Ritland; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Somatic deleterious mutation rate in a woody plant: estimation from phenotypic data.

Authors:  K Bobiwash; S T Schultz; D J Schoen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  A Comparison of transgenic and wild type soybean seeds: analysis of transcriptome profiles using RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Kevin C Lambirth; Adam M Whaley; Ivory C Blakley; Jessica A Schlueter; Kenneth L Bost; Ann E Loraine; Kenneth J Piller
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.563

8.  Inbreeding and selection shape genomic diversity in captive populations: Implications for the conservation of endangered species.

Authors:  Janna R Willoughby; Jamie A Ivy; Robert C Lacy; Jacqueline M Doyle; J Andrew DeWoody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mutations in a Novel Cadherin Gene Associated with Bt Resistance in Helicoverpa zea.

Authors:  Megan L Fritz; Schyler O Nunziata; Rong Guo; Bruce E Tabashnik; Yves Carrière
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  A phylogenomic approach reveals a low somatic mutation rate in a long-lived plant.

Authors:  Adam J Orr; Amanda Padovan; David Kainer; Carsten Külheim; Lindell Bromham; Carlos Bustos-Segura; William Foley; Tonya Haff; Ji-Fan Hsieh; Alejandro Morales-Suarez; Reed A Cartwright; Robert Lanfear
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.