Literature DB >> 9419362

Marginal fitness contributions of nonessential genes in yeast.

J W Thatcher1, J M Shaw, W J Dickinson.   

Abstract

Analysis of the complete genome sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae confirms and extends earlier evidence that a majority of yeast genes are not essential, at least under laboratory conditions. Many fail to yield a discernible mutant phenotype even when disrupted. Genes not subject to natural selection would accumulate inactivating mutations, so these "cryptic" genes must have functions that are overlooked by the standard methods of yeast genetics. Two explanations seem possible: (i) They have important functions only in environments not yet duplicated in the laboratory and would have conditional phenotypes if tested appropriately. (ii) They make small, but significant, contributions to fitness even under routine growth conditions, but the effects are not large enough to be detected by conventional methods. We have tested the second "marginal benefit" hypothesis by measuring the fitnesses of a random collection of disruption mutants in direct competition with their wild-type progenitor. A substantial majority of mutant strains that lack obvious defects nevertheless are at a significant selective disadvantage just growing on rich medium under normal conditions. This result has important implications for efforts to understand the functions of novel genes revealed by sequencing projects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9419362      PMCID: PMC18192          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  Can genes be truly redundant?

Authors:  J Brookfield
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  The role of the genome project in determining gene function: insights from model organisms.

Authors:  G L Miklos; G M Rubin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-08-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  The neutral theory is dead. Long live the neutral theory.

Authors:  M Kreitman
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 4.  The yeast genome project: what did we learn?

Authors:  B Dujon
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Towards a complete understanding of how a simple eukaryotic cell works.

Authors:  M Johnston
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Punctuated evolution caused by selection of rare beneficial mutations.

Authors:  S F Elena; V S Cooper; R E Lenski
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphism.

Authors:  T Ota
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Regulation of the yeast HO gene.

Authors:  L Breeden; K Nasmyth
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1985

Review 9.  Asymmetry--where evolutionary and developmental genetics meet.

Authors:  P Batterham; A G Davies; A Y Game; J A McKenzie
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.345

10.  Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations.

Authors:  C Paquin; J Adams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of molecular evolution.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Quantitative target display: a method to screen yeast mutants conferring quantitative phenotypes by 'mutant DNA fingerprints'.

Authors:  V M Sharma; R Chopra; I Ghosh; K Ganesan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Use of the transposon Ac as a gene-searching engine in the maize genome.

Authors:  Matthew Cowperthwaite; Wonkeun Park; Zhennan Xu; Xianghe Yan; Steven C Maurais; Hugo K Dooner
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  A question of size: the eukaryotic proteome and the problems in defining it.

Authors:  Paul M Harrison; Anuj Kumar; Ning Lang; Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Profiling patterned transcripts in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Karl Simin; Anne Scuderi; James Reamey; Diane Dunn; Robert Weiss; James E Metherall; Anthea Letsou
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  High-resolution yeast phenomics resolves different physiological features in the saline response.

Authors:  Jonas Warringer; Elke Ericson; Luciano Fernandez; Olle Nerman; Anders Blomberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Bioinformatical assay of human gene morbidity.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Measuring selection coefficients below 10(-3): method, questions, and prospects.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Tim F Cooper; Santiago F Elena; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Molecular evolution, mutation size and gene pleiotropy: a geometric reexamination.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Darko Cotoras; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Mechanisms of tumor resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hopper-Borge; Rochelle E Nasto; Vladimir Ratushny; Louis M Weiner; Erica A Golemis; Igor Astsaturov
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.902

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.