Literature DB >> 9416413

Role of conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

M Bouvet1, D W Ollila, K K Hunt, G V Babiera, F R Spitz, A E Giuliano, E A Strom, F C Ames, M I Ross, S E Singletary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5% to 10% of all invasive breast cancers. Although breast conservation therapy using local excision and postoperative irradiation is a standard therapy for early invasive ductal breast cancer, the result of this strategy in ILC is not well documented. We sought to determine the rate of locoregional recurrence after breast conservation therapy in patients with ILC.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 74 patients with ILC treated with breast conservation therapy at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (n = 43) or The John Wayne Cancer Institute (n = 31) between 1977 and 1993 was performed.
RESULTS: The median age of patients was 60 years, and median follow-up was 56 months (range 1 to 207 months). Thirty-nine patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I disease, 30 had stage IIa disease, and five had stage IIb disease. All patients underwent surgical resection and postoperative radiation therapy. Twelve patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and 27 patients were treated with adjuvant hormonal therapy. The 5-year actuarial locoregional recurrence rate was 9.8%, and the median time to recurrence was 77 months (range 41 to 113 months). Patients with positive or close (< or = 1 mm) surgical margins were at increased risk for local recurrence on univariate analysis (p = 0.034). Of the nine patients with breast recurrence, six underwent salvage therapy with total mastectomy and are disease free at the time of this writing, two patients died of distant disease, and one is alive with local disease at the time of this report. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 93.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast conservation therapy for ILC achieves locoregional control in the majority of patients. However, long-term follow-up of patients is important because many local recurrences following breast conservation therapy are late events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9416413     DOI: 10.1007/bf02303750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

1.  Treatment trends in early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  S Eva Singletary; Lina Patel-Parekh; Kirby I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Margin assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular cancer.

Authors:  Jamie Wagner; Judy C Boughey; Betsy Garrett; Gildy Babiera; Henry Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Eva Singletary; Kelly K Hunt; Lavinia P Middleton; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Comparison of mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery in invasive lobular carcinoma: 15-Year results.

Authors:  János Fodor; Tibor Major; József Tóth; Zoltán Sulyok; Csaba Polgár
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-07-27

4.  Present and changing trends in surgical modalities and neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration for female breast cancer in Beijing, China: A 10-year (2006-2015) retrospective hospitalization summary report-based study.

Authors:  Xiaoyuan Bao; Kexin Sun; Xin Tian; Qiongzhou Yin; Meng Jin; Na Yu; Hanfang Jiang; Jun Zhang; Yonghua Hu
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  A comparison of the clinical outcomes of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to molecular subtype in a Korean population.

Authors:  Seung Taek Lim; Jong Han Yu; Heung Kyu Park; Byung In Moon; Byung Kyun Ko; Young Jin Suh
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.