Literature DB >> 9415390

Near- and far-fields: source characteristics and the conducting medium in neurophysiology.

D F Stegeman1, D Dumitru, J C King, K Roeleveld.   

Abstract

It is possible to appreciate the production of far-field potentials by considering constant current dipolar source voltage distributions in bounded volumes, especially when they are stretched in one direction, e.g., a cylinder. An essentially nondeclining voltage is detected when the recording electrodes are on opposite sides of, and relatively far from, the dipolar source. This voltage maintains its (a) latency, (b) amplitude, (c) morphology, and (d) polarity even if recordings are performed a whole body length away. These four criteria define far-field potentials. A propagating action potential (AP) can be conceptualized as a linear quadrupole or the summation of two dipoles "back-to-back" (+ - - +). The far-field components of the summated dipoles cancel resulting in the anticipated triphasic waveform for APs with only near-field characteristics, not meeting the first three criteria above. Far-field potentials can be transiently generated when any propagating AP constitutes a net "real" or "virtual" dipolar source. "Real" dipolar sources can occur if an AP encounters the termination of excitable tissue, an alteration in conduction velocity, curvature in excitable tissue resulting in a change in propagation direction, or an abrupt change in resistance of the excitable tissue. Virtual dipolar sources may be produced if an AP encounters a change in the size or shape of the extracellular medium or a transition in extracellular conductivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9415390     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199709000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  13 in total

Review 1.  Surface electromyogram signal modelling.

Authors:  K C McGill
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Spatial variability in cortex-muscle coherence investigated with magnetoencephalography and high-density surface electromyography.

Authors:  Harri Piitulainen; Alberto Botter; Mathieu Bourguignon; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Monopolar surface electromyography: a better tool to assess motoneuron excitability upon passive muscle stretching.

Authors:  Hikmat Hadoush; Yoshiko Tobimatsu; Akiyoshi Nagatomi; Hiroaki Kimura; Yoshihiro Ito; Hiroshi Maejima
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 4.  Electrical impedance myography: A critical review and outlook.

Authors:  Benjamin Sanchez; Orjan G Martinsen; Todd J Freeborn; Cynthia M Furse
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Classification of the extracellular fields produced by activated neural structures.

Authors:  Samantha Richerson; Mark Ingram; Danielle Perry; Mark M Stecker
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Correlates of a single cortical action potential in the epidural EEG.

Authors:  Bartosz Teleńczuk; Stuart N Baker; Richard Kempter; Gabriel Curio
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Detection of Multiple Innervation Zones from Multi-Channel Surface EMG Recordings with Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio Using Graph-Cut Segmentation.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Marateb; Morteza Farahi; Monica Rojas; Miguel Angel Mañanas; Dario Farina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Changes in tibialis anterior architecture affect the amplitude of surface electromyograms.

Authors:  Taian M Vieira; Maria Cristina Bisi; Rita Stagni; Alberto Botter
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Repeatability of nerve conduction measurements derived entirely by computer methods.

Authors:  Xuan Kong; Eugene A Lesser; Shai N Gozani
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Putative Auditory-Evoked Neurophonic Measurements Using a Novel Signal Processing Technique: A Pilot Case Study.

Authors:  Alison M Cook; Ashleigh J Allsop; Greg A O'Beirne
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.