Literature DB >> 26354317

Spatial variability in cortex-muscle coherence investigated with magnetoencephalography and high-density surface electromyography.

Harri Piitulainen1, Alberto Botter2, Mathieu Bourguignon3, Veikko Jousmäki3, Riitta Hari3.   

Abstract

Cortex-muscle coherence (CMC) reflects coupling between magnetoencephalography (MEG) and surface electromyography (sEMG), being strongest during isometric contraction but absent, for unknown reasons, in some individuals. We used a novel nonmagnetic high-density sEMG (HD-sEMG) electrode grid (36 mm × 12 mm; 60 electrodes separated by 3 mm) to study effects of sEMG recording site, electrode derivation, and rectification on the strength of CMC. Monopolar sEMG from right thenar and 306-channel whole-scalp MEG were recorded from 14 subjects during 4-min isometric thumb abduction. CMC was computed for 60 monopolar, 55 bipolar, and 32 Laplacian HD-sEMG derivations, and two derivations were computed to mimic "macroscopic" monopolar and bipolar sEMG (electrode diameter 9 mm; interelectrode distance 21 mm). With unrectified sEMG, 12 subjects showed statistically significant CMC in 91-95% of the HD-sEMG channels, with maximum coherence at ∼25 Hz. CMC was about a fifth stronger for monopolar than bipolar and Laplacian derivations. Monopolar derivations resulted in most uniform CMC distributions across the thenar and in tightest cortical source clusters in the left rolandic hand area. CMC was 19-27% stronger for HD-sEMG than for "macroscopic" monopolar or bipolar derivations. EMG rectification reduced the CMC peak by a quarter, resulted in a more uniformly distributed CMC across the thenar, and provided more tightly clustered cortical sources than unrectifed sEMGs. Moreover, it revealed CMC at ∼12 Hz. We conclude that HD-sEMG, especially with monopolar derivation, can facilitate detection of CMC and that individual muscle anatomy cannot explain the high interindividual CMC variability.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corticomuscular coherence; magnetoencephalography; multichannel EMG; sensorimotor cortex; spatial filter

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26354317      PMCID: PMC4737422          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00574.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  58 in total

Review 1.  Rhythmical corticomotor communication.

Authors:  R Hari; S Salenius
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-02-05       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Influence of amplitude cancellation on the simulated surface electromyogram.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Dario Farina; Katrina S Maluf; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-09-17

3.  A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles.

Authors:  A Rainoldi; G Melchiorri; I Caruso
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Reproducibility of cortex-muscle coherence.

Authors:  Marjatta Pohja; Stephan Salenius; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A new method to estimate signal cancellation in the human maximal M-wave.

Authors:  K J Tucker; K S Türker
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 6.  Diagnostic functional MRI: illustrated clinical applications and decision-making.

Authors:  Andreas Joachim Bartsch; György Homola; Armin Biller; László Solymosi; Martin Bendszus
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Improving EMG-based muscle force estimation by using a high-density EMG grid and principal component analysis.

Authors:  Didier Staudenmann; Idsart Kingma; Andreas Daffertshofer; Dick F Stegeman; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Using electroencephalography to study functional coupling between cortical activity and electromyograms during voluntary contractions in humans.

Authors:  D M Halliday; B A Conway; S F Farmer; J R Rosenberg
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1998-01-23       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Utilization of magnetoencephalography results to obtain favourable outcomes in epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Michael J M Fischer; Gabriela Scheler; Hermann Stefan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements.

Authors:  S Taulu; J Simola
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  3 in total

1.  The network sustaining action myoclonus: a MEG-EMG study in patients with EPM1.

Authors:  Silvana Franceschetti; Laura Canafoglia; Fabio Rotondi; Elisa Visani; Alice Granvillano; Ferruccio Panzica
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.474

2.  Aging and Strength Training Influence Knee Extensor Intermuscular Coherence During Low- and High-Force Isometric Contractions.

Authors:  Simon Walker; Janne Avela; Jan Wikgren; Romain Meeusen; Harri Piitulainen; Stuart N Baker; Tiina M Parviainen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  EEG hyperscanning in motor rehabilitation: a position paper.

Authors:  Matthew R Short; Julio C Hernandez-Pavon; Alyssa Jones; Jose L Pons
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.