Literature DB >> 9414318

Zooming in on the human-mouse comparative map: genome conservation re-examined on a high-resolution scale.

E A Carver1, L Stubbs.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, conservation of genetic linkage groups has been shown in mammals and used to great advantage, fueling significant exchanges of gene mapping and functional information especially between the genomes of humans and mice. As human physical maps increase in resolution from chromosome bands to nucleotide sequence, comparative alignments of mouse and human regions have revealed striking similarities and surprising differences between the genomes of these two best-mapped mammalian species. Whereas, at present, very few mouse and human regions have been compared on the physical level, existing studies provide intriguing insights to genome evolution, including the observation of recent duplications and deletions of genes that may play significant roles in defining some of the biological differences between the two species. Although high-resolution conserved marker-based maps are currently available only for human and mouse, a variety of new methods and resources are speeding the development of comparative maps of additional organisms. These advances mark the first step toward establishment of the human genome as a reference map for vertebrate species, providing evolutionary and functional annotation to human sequence and vast new resources for genetic analysis of a variety of commercially, medically, and ecologically important animal models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9414318     DOI: 10.1101/gr.7.12.1123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  29 in total

1.  Arabidopsis-rice: will colinearity allow gene prediction across the eudicot-monocot divide?

Authors:  K M Devos; J Beales; Y Nagamura; T Sasaki
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Extensive conservation of sex chromosome organization between cat and human revealed by parallel radiation hybrid mapping.

Authors:  W J Murphy; S Sun; Z Q Chen; J Pecon-Slattery; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Perfect conserved linkage across the entire mouse chromosome 10 region homologous to human chromosome 21.

Authors:  T Wiltshire; M Pletcher; S E Cole; M Villanueva; B Birren; J Lehoczky; K Dewar; R H Reeves
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  A chromosome-based model for estimating the number of conserved segments between pairs of species from comparative genetic maps.

Authors:  D Waddington; A J Springbett; D W Burt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Comparative maps of human 19p13.3 and mouse chromosome 10 allow identification of sequences at evolutionary breakpoints.

Authors:  R Puttagunta; L A Gordon; G E Meyer; D Kapfhamer; J E Lamerdin; P Kantheti; K M Portman; W K Chung; D E Jenne; A S Olsen; M Burmeister
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Cloning, comparative characterization of porcine SCAP gene, and identification of its two splice variants.

Authors:  Huan Qiu; Tao Xia; Xiaodong Chen; Xuelian Zhao; Li Gan; Shengqiu Feng; Ting Lei; Zaiqing Yang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 3.291

7.  Parallel radiation hybrid mapping: a powerful tool for high-resolution genomic comparison.

Authors:  Y P Yang; J E Womack
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Comparative gene mapping in cattle, Indian muntjac, and Chinese muntjac by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Andrea E Murmann; Antoaneta Mincheva; Markus O Scheuermann; Mathieu Gautier; Fentang Yang; Johannes Buitkamp; Pamela L Strissel; Reiner Strick; Janet D Rowley; Peter Lichter
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Bioinformatic mining of type I microsatellites from expressed sequence tags of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus).

Authors:  Jerry Serapion; Huseyin Kucuktas; Jinian Feng; Zhanjiang Liu
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 10.  Mouse models for radiation-induced cancers.

Authors:  Leena Rivina; Michael J Davoren; Robert H Schiestl
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.