Literature DB >> 9413863

Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns.

V Kolehmainen1, M Vauhkonen, P A Karjalainen, J P Kaipio.   

Abstract

In electrical impedance tomography (EIT), difference imaging is often preferred over static imaging. This is because of the many unknowns in the forward modelling which make it difficult to obtain reliable absolute resistivity estimates. However, static imaging and absolute resistivity values are needed in some potential applications of EIT. In this paper we demonstrate by simulation the effects of different error components that are included in the reconstruction of static EIT images. All simulations are carried out in two dimensions with the so-called complete electrode model. Errors that are considered are the modelling error in the boundary shape of an object, errors in the electrode sizes and localizations and errors in the contact impedances under the electrodes. Results using both adjacent and trigonometric current patterns are given.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9413863     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/18/4/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  16 in total

Review 1.  Front-end architecture for a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography system.

Authors:  D Jennings; I D Schneider
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Imaging cardiac activity by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  D Isaacson; J L Mueller; J C Newell; S Siltanen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  A 3D reconstruction algorithm for EIT using a handheld probe for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Tzu-Jen Kao; D Isaacson; J C Newell; G J Saulnier
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Reducing boundary effects in static EIT imaging.

Authors:  Tzu-Jen Kao; Bong Seok Kim; D Isaacson; J C Newell; G J Saulnier
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  Evaluation of measurement and stimulation patterns in open electrical impedance tomography with scanning electrode.

Authors:  Jinzhen Liu; Hui Xiong; Ling Lin; Gang Li
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Optical breast shape capture and finite-element mesh generation for electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  J Forsyth; A Borsic; R J Halter; A Hartov; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Quantification of intraventricular hemorrhage with electrical impedance tomography using a spherical model.

Authors:  T Tang; R J Sadleir
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.833

8.  Absolute Reconstructions Using Rotational Electrical Impedance Tomography for Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Ethan K Murphy; Aditya Mahara; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Efficient Simultaneous Reconstruction of Time-Varying Images and Electrode Contact Impedances in Electrical Impedance Tomography.

Authors:  Gregory Boverman; David Isaacson; Jonathan C Newell; Gary J Saulnier; Tzu-Jen Kao; Bruce C Amm; Xin Wang; David M Davenport; David H Chong; Rakesh Sahni; Jeffrey M Ashe
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Frequency-division multiplexing for electrical impedance tomography in biomedical applications.

Authors:  Yair Granot; Antoni Ivorra; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.