Literature DB >> 9412803

Grade, local stage and growth pattern as prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis.

H Villavicencio1, J Rubio-Briones, R Regalado, G Chéchile, F Algaba, J Palou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the management of adenopathies and the determination of prognostic factors in the treatment of squamous carcinoma of the penis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 81 cases treated at our Institution between 1980 and 1994. In 62 cases, we review the pathologic samples according to the growth patterns proposed by Cubilla et al.
RESULTS: We find that both the grade of cellular differentiation and the local stage of the tumor are statistically significant with respect to the presence of positive adenopathies. We obtain results similar to Cubilla's work and different survival rates for the patterns of tumor growth.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our results, we propose 3 differentiated follow-up and treatment groups. We suggest that the new growth pattern classification is useful as prognostic factor in carcinoma of the penis. We corroborate that prophylactic lymphadenectomy is indicated in tumors of vertical growth, while a conservative management should be considered in tumors of verrucous growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9412803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

1.  Penile cancer: a case for guidelines.

Authors:  N P Munro; P J Thomas; G P Deutsch; N J Hodson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Management of carcinoma of the penis: Consensus statement from the Canadian Association of Genitourinary Medical Oncologists (CAGMO).

Authors:  Suzanne Richter; J Dean Ruether; Lori Wood; Christina Canil; Patricia Moretto; Peter Venner; Joel Gingerich; Urban Emmenegger; Andrea Eisen; Pawel Zalewski; Anthony Joshua; Som Dave Mukherjee; Daniel Heng; Piotr Czaykowski; Denis Soulieres; Norman Blais; Ricardo Rendon; Neil Fleshner; Juanita M Crook; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  [Pathology and histopathological evaluation of penile cancer].

Authors:  A Erbersdobler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  What next? Managing lymph nodes in men with penile cancer.

Authors:  Michael Leveridge; D Robert Siemens; Christopher Morash
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  A review of penile cancer.

Authors:  A Rando Sous; M Pérez-Utrilla Pérez; A Aguilera Bazán; A Tabernero Gomez; J Cisneros Ledo; J De la Peña Barthel
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-02-16

6.  GRP-induced up-regulation of Hsp72 promotes CD16+/94+ natural killer cell binding to colon cancer cells causing tumor cell cytolysis.

Authors:  Lauren Taglia; Damien Matusiak; Richard V Benya
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Carcinoma penis: How late can inguinal nodal metastases occur?

Authors:  Anil Kamath; T B Yuvaraja; H B Tongaonkar; S Kane
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07

Review 8.  The role of pathologic prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Antonio L Cubilla
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Predictive pathological factors of lymph nodes involvement in the squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Guido Martignoni; Nicola Maffei; Maria Angela Cerruto; Giacomo Novara; Stefano Cavalleri; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Penile cancer: Perspective from a Canadian tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Benjamin Beech; Jonathan Izawa; Stephen Pautler; Joseph Chin; Nicholas Power
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.