Literature DB >> 9412611

Lubeluzole treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The US and Canadian Lubeluzole Ischemic Stroke Study Group.

J Grotta1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Lubeluzole is a novel benzothiazole compound that has shown neuroprotective activity in preclinical models of ischemic stroke. The present multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of lubeluzole in the treatment of ischemic stroke.
METHODS: Seven hundred twenty-one patients with clinical symptoms of acute ischemic stroke were randomized to receive either lubeluzole (7.5 mg over 1 hour, followed by a continuous daily infusion of 10 mg for up to 5 days) or placebo. Treatment was initiated within 6 hours of symptom onset. Mortality at 12 weeks was the primary efficacy end point. Secondary efficacy end points included neurological recovery (based on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), functional status (based on the Barthel Index), and level of disability (based on the Rankin Scale). Safety assessments included standard and continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, physical examination, measurements of vital signs, clinical laboratory evaluation, and adverse events reports.
RESULTS: The overall mortality rate at 12 weeks for lubeluzole-treated patients was 20.7% compared to 25.2% for placebo-treated patients (NS). Controlling for relevant covariates, the degree of neurological recovery (NIHSS) at week 12 significantly favored lubeluzole over placebo (P = .033). Lubeluzole treatment similarly resulted in significantly greater improvements in functional status (Barthel Index) (P = .038) and overall disability (Rankin Scale) (P = .034) after 12 weeks. A global test statistic confirmed that lubeluzole-treated patients had a more favorable clinical outcome at 12 weeks (P = .041). The safety profile of lubeluzole resembled that of placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with lubeluzole within 6 hours of the onset of ischemic stroke had a nonsignificant effect on mortality and resulted in improved clinical outcome compared with placebo, with no safety concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9412611     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  26 in total

Review 1.  New developments in endovascular interventions for extracranial carotid stenosis.

Authors:  W A Tan; C R Jarmolowski; L R Wechsler; M H Wholey
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II.

Authors:  G Samsa; D Edelman; M L Rothman; G R Williams; J Lipscomb; D Matchar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A comparison of three health status measures in primary care outpatients.

Authors:  D Edelman; G R Williams; M Rothman; G P Samsa
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Why have neuro-protectants failed?: lessons learned from stroke trials.

Authors:  K W Muir; Ph A Teal
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Neuroprotection for ischemic stroke: past, present and future.

Authors:  Myron D Ginsberg
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Pathophysiological approach to stroke therapy.

Authors:  G L Lenzi; M Altieri; G Bruti; S Di Legge; D Lenzi; I Pestalozza; D Tombari; E Vicenzini; V Di Piero
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-10

Review 7.  Clinical trials for cytoprotection in stroke.

Authors:  Lise A Labiche; James C Grotta
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-01

8.  An Outcome Model for Intravenous rt-PA in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Pitchaiah Mandava; Shreyansh D Shah; Anand K Sarma; Thomas A Kent
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Is the NIHSS certification process too lenient?

Authors:  Nancy K Hills; S Andrew Josephson; Patrick D Lyden; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 10.  Excitatory amino acid antagonists for acute stroke.

Authors:  K W Muir; K R Lees
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.