Literature DB >> 9406745

Evaluation of chemotherapy response in patients with advanced head and neck cancer using [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

V J Lowe1, F R Dunphy, M Varvares, H Kim, M Wittry, C H Dunphy, T Dunleavy, E McDonough, J Minster, J W Fletcher, J H Boyd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: [F-18]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) can measure the metabolic activity of tissues; FDG-PET may be able to predict response to chemotherapy by identifying changes in tumor metabolism. Measurement of response to treatment may help improve survival in the management of advanced head and neck cancer. We evaluated this particular use of FDG-PET in patients participating in a neoadjuvant organ-preservation protocol using taxol and carboplatin and compared pathologic response after chemotherapy with changes in tumor metabolism measured by FDG-PET.
METHODS: Serial FDG-PET studies (n = 56) were performed in patients (n = 28) with stage III/IV head and neck cancer participating in a neoadjuvant organ-preservation protocol. The FDG-PET studies were performed before and after chemotherapy. All patients had tissue biopsies before and after chemotherapy. Patients were classified as pathologic complete response (PCR) or residual disease (RD) based on tissue biopsies. Visual analysis of PET scans was performed to identify patients with complete response by PET, and these findings were compared with pathology results. Metabolic changes were also evaluated using standardized uptake ratios (SUR) of FDG.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of PET for residual cancer after therapy was 90% (19/21) and 83% (5/6), respectively. Two patients had initially negative biopsies and positive PET studies for persistent disease. Pathology review and rebiospy led to confirmation of the PET results in these cases, giving a sensitivity of 90% for initial tissue biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary analysis, FDG-PET was accurate in classifying response to chemotherapy in most patients. Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET may identify residual viable tumor when it is otherwise undetectable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9406745     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199712)19:8<666::aid-hed4>3.0.co;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  19 in total

1.  Early restaging whole-body (18)F-FDG PET during induction chemotherapy predicts clinical outcome in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ruoh-Fang Yen; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Lai-Lei Ting; Kai-Yuan Tzen; Mei-Hsiu Pan; Ruey-Long Hong
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Controversies: is there a role for positron-emission tomographic CT in the initial staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Suresh K Mukherji; Carol R Bradford
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  18F-FDG PET response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma are different.

Authors:  Louie L Gaston; Claudia Di Bella; John Slavin; Rodney J Hicks; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Advantage of FMISO-PET over FDG-PET for predicting histological response to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Sato; Yoshimasa Kitagawa; Yutaka Yamazaki; Hironobu Hata; Takuya Asaka; Masaaki Miyakoshi; Shozo Okamoto; Tohru Shiga; Masanobu Shindoh; Yuji Kuge; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Diagnostic modalities for distant metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: are we changing life expectancy?

Authors:  Matthew E Spector; Steven B Chinn; Andrew J Rosko; Francis P Worden; P Daniel Ward; Vasu Divi; Scott A McLean; Jeffrey S Moyer; Mark E P Prince; Gregory T Wolf; Douglas B Chepeha; Carol R Bradford
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Evaluation of overall tumor cellularity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patient with locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Shun-ichi Chitose; Hideki Chijiwa; Akiteru Maeda; Hirohito Umeno; Tadashi Nakashima; Kensuke Kiyokawa; Naofumi Hayabuchi; Hiromasa Fujita
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vasavi Paidpally; Alin Chirindel; Stella Lam; Nishant Agrawal; Harry Quon; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2012-12

8.  Preoperative [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography standardized uptake value of neck lymph nodes may aid in selecting patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma for salvage therapy after relapse.

Authors:  Chun-Ta Liao; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Hung-Ming Wang; Shu-Hang Ng; Shiang-Fu Huang; I-How Chen; Chuen Hsueh; Li-Yu Lee; Chih-Hung Lin; Ann-Joy Cheng; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Response prediction by FDG-PET after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and combined regional hyperthermia of rectal cancer: correlation with endorectal ultrasound and histopathology.

Authors:  Holger Amthauer; Timm Denecke; Beate Rau; Bert Hildebrandt; Michael Hünerbein; Juri Ruf; Ulrike Schneider; Matthias Gutberlet; Peter M Schlag; Roland Felix; Peter Wust
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  The role of SPET and PET in monitoring tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  Chariklia Giannopoulou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.