Literature DB >> 9406011

Ultrasound enhances gene expression of liposomal transfection.

E C Unger1, T P McCreery, R H Sweitzer.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Cationic liposomes are under development as delivery agents for gene therapy. The authors studied the effect of ultrasound on gene expression in cell cultures during liposomal transfection experiments.
METHODS: Cationic liposomes of dipalmitoylethylphosphocholine and dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine were used to transfect cultured HeLa, NIH/3T3, and C127I cells with the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene. A cell viability assay was performed on cultured HeLa cells that were exposed to varying durations (5 seconds or 30 seconds) and intensities of 1 MHz continuous-wave therapeutic ultrasound after transfection, and gene expression was measured 48 hours later.
RESULTS: Cells survived 30 seconds or less at a power level of 0.5 watts/cm2 but died when exposed for 60 seconds or longer. Exposures of 5 seconds and 30 seconds of ultrasound resulted in significant increases in gene expression in all three cell types tested in this experiment.
CONCLUSIONS: Relatively low levels of ultrasound energy can be used to enhance gene expression from liposomal transfection. Additional experiments are needed to optimize this process and clarify the mechanisms involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9406011     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199712000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  21 in total

Review 1.  Improvement of DNA transfection with cationic liposomes.

Authors:  A Rocha; S Ruiz; J M Coll
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.158

Review 2.  Ultrasonic drug delivery--a general review.

Authors:  William G Pitt; Ghaleb A Husseini; Bryant J Staples
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.648

3.  Synergistic effect of ultrasound and PEI on DNA transfection in vitro.

Authors:  Mangesh C Deshpande; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Nonthermal effects of therapeutic ultrasound: the frequency resonance hypothesis.

Authors:  Lennart D Johns
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Can ultrasound solve the transport barrier of the neural retina?

Authors:  Liesbeth Peeters; Ine Lentacker; Roosmarijn E Vandenbroucke; Bart Lucas; Joseph Demeester; Niek N Sanders; Stefaan C De Smedt
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery.

Authors:  Ferenc A Jolesz
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.739

7.  Interrelation between HeLa-S3 cell transfection and hemolysis in red blood cell suspension using pulsed ultrasound of various duty cycles.

Authors:  Y Liu; H Uno; H Takatsuki; M Hirano; A Sakanishi
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.733

8.  Ultrasound for molecular imaging and therapy in cancer.

Authors:  Osamu F Kaneko; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-06

Review 9.  Nanoparticle delivery enhancement with acoustically activated microbubbles.

Authors:  Lee B Mullin; Linsey C Phillips; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles.

Authors:  Parag V Chitnis; Sujeethraj Koppolu; Jonathan Mamou; Ceciel Chlon; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.