OBJECTIVE: To determine whether transthoracic three dimensional echocardiography is an accurate non-invasive technique for defining the morphology of atrial septal defects (ASD). METHODS: In 34 patients with secundum ASD, mean (SD) age 20 (17) years (14 male, 20 female), the measurements obtained from three dimensional echocardiography were compared to those obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or surgery. Three dimensional images were constructed to simulate the ASD view as seen by a surgeon. Measured variables were: maximum and minimum vertical and horizontal ASD dimension, and distances to inferior and superior vena cava, coronary sinus, and tricuspid valve. In each patient two ultrasound techniques were used to acquire three dimensional data: standard grey scale imaging (GSI) and Doppler myocardial imaging (DMI). RESULTS: Good correlation was found in maximum ASD dimension (both horizontal and vertical) between three dimensional echocardiography and both MRI (GSI r = 0.96, SEE = 0.05 cm; DMI r = 0.97, SEE = 0.04 cm) and surgery (GSI r = 0.92, SEE = 0.06 cm; DMI r = 0.95, SEE = 0.06 cm). The systematic error was similar for both three dimensional techniques when compared to both MRI (GSI = 0.40 cm (27%); DMI = 0.38 cm (25%)) and surgery (GSI = 0.50 cm (29%); DMI = 0.37 cm (22%)). A significant difference was found in both horizontal and vertical ASD dimension changes during the cardiac cycle. This change was inversely correlated with age. These findings were consistent for both DMI and GSI technique. In children (age < or = 17 years), the feasibility of detecting structures and undertaking measurements was similar for both echo techniques. However, in adult ASD patients (age > or = 18 years) this feasibility was higher for DMI than for GSI. CONCLUSIONS: Transthoracic three dimensional imaging using both GSI and DMI accurately displayed the varying morphology, dimensions, and spatial relations of ASD. However, DMI was a more effective technique than GSI in describing ASD morphology in adults.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether transthoracic three dimensional echocardiography is an accurate non-invasive technique for defining the morphology of atrial septal defects (ASD). METHODS: In 34 patients with secundum ASD, mean (SD) age 20 (17) years (14 male, 20 female), the measurements obtained from three dimensional echocardiography were compared to those obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or surgery. Three dimensional images were constructed to simulate the ASD view as seen by a surgeon. Measured variables were: maximum and minimum vertical and horizontal ASD dimension, and distances to inferior and superior vena cava, coronary sinus, and tricuspid valve. In each patient two ultrasound techniques were used to acquire three dimensional data: standard grey scale imaging (GSI) and Doppler myocardial imaging (DMI). RESULTS: Good correlation was found in maximum ASD dimension (both horizontal and vertical) between three dimensional echocardiography and both MRI (GSI r = 0.96, SEE = 0.05 cm; DMI r = 0.97, SEE = 0.04 cm) and surgery (GSI r = 0.92, SEE = 0.06 cm; DMI r = 0.95, SEE = 0.06 cm). The systematic error was similar for both three dimensional techniques when compared to both MRI (GSI = 0.40 cm (27%); DMI = 0.38 cm (25%)) and surgery (GSI = 0.50 cm (29%); DMI = 0.37 cm (22%)). A significant difference was found in both horizontal and vertical ASD dimension changes during the cardiac cycle. This change was inversely correlated with age. These findings were consistent for both DMI and GSI technique. In children (age < or = 17 years), the feasibility of detecting structures and undertaking measurements was similar for both echo techniques. However, in adult ASDpatients (age > or = 18 years) this feasibility was higher for DMI than for GSI. CONCLUSIONS: Transthoracic three dimensional imaging using both GSI and DMI accurately displayed the varying morphology, dimensions, and spatial relations of ASD. However, DMI was a more effective technique than GSI in describing ASD morphology in adults.
Authors: K Morimoto; M Matsuzaki; Y Tohma; S Ono; N Tanaka; H Michishige; K Murata; Y Anno; R Kusukawa Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1990-07-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: R E Dinsmore; G L Wismer; D Guyer; R Thompson; P Liu; E Stratemeier; S Miller; R Okada; T Brady Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1985-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: C Shub; I N Dimopoulos; J B Seward; J A Callahan; R G Tancredi; T T Schattenberg; G S Reeder; D J Hagler; A J Tajik Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1983-07 Impact factor: 24.094