Literature DB >> 9400945

Conversion of the prodrug etoposide phosphate to etoposide in gastric juice and bile.

R S de Jong1, E A Slijfer, D R Uges, N H Mulder, E G de Vries.   

Abstract

Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. It was expected that this prodrug could be used to overcome the solubility limitations and erratic bioavailability of oral etoposide. To investigate the possibility of prodrug conversion to etoposide within the gastrointestinal lumen, etoposide phosphate was dissolved in water and incubated with human gastric juice or human bile in vitro. Samples were collected during 150 min and analysed for etoposide concentration with high-performance liquid chromatography. Conversion of prodrug to etoposide during incubation with gastric juice was negligible. There was significant conversion during incubation with bile at pH 7-8. The percentage of prodrug converted to etoposide at pH 8 after 60 min was 78 +/- 18% (mean +/- S.D.) for a 0.1 mg ml-1 prodrug solution and 36 +/- 26% for 0.5 mg ml-1. At pH 7, after 60 min 22% of prodrug was converted to etoposide when incubated at 0.1 mg ml-1 and 10% at 0.5 mg ml-1. No conversion was found after inactivation of alkaline phosphate (AP) by overnight heating of bile at 65 degrees C or by the addition of disodium edetate to the bile. In conclusion, because of AP in bile, variable conversion of etoposide phosphate to etoposide can be expected within the intestinal lumen after oral administration. This could have important pharmacokinetic consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9400945      PMCID: PMC2228182          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  11 in total

1.  Probability distribution of multiple scattered light measured in total transmission.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-11-07       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Effects of clear liquids on gastric volume and pH in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  K Shevde; N Trivedi; M Gross
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  pH-profile and regional transit times of the normal gut measured by a radiotelemetry device.

Authors:  J Fallingborg; L A Christensen; M Ingeman-Nielsen; B A Jacobsen; K Abildgaard; H H Rasmussen
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Preformulation study of etoposide: identification of physicochemical characteristics responsible for the low and erratic oral bioavailability of etoposide.

Authors:  J C Shah; J R Chen; D Chow
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Variable bioavailability following repeated oral doses of etoposide.

Authors:  V J Harvey; M L Slevin; S P Joel; M M Smythe; A Johnston; P F Wrigley
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-11

6.  The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide: confirmation of a clinically relevant observation.

Authors:  M L Slevin; S P Joel; R Whomsley; K Devenport; V J Harvey; R J Osborne; P F Wrigley
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oral etoposide phosphate.

Authors:  C Sessa; M Zucchetti; T Cerny; O Pagani; F Cavalli; M De Fusco; J De Jong; D Gentili; C McDaniel; C Prins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Stability of the i.v. and oral formulations of etoposide in solution.

Authors:  S P Joel; P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Anti-tumor effects of antibody-alkaline phosphatase conjugates in combination with etoposide phosphate.

Authors:  P D Senter; M G Saulnier; G J Schreiber; D L Hirschberg; J P Brown; I Hellström; K E Hellström
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide.

Authors:  R S de Jong; N H Mulder; D R Uges; S Kaul; B Winograd; H J Groen; P H Willemse; W T van der Graaf; E G de Vries
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Effects of food on the clinical pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents: underlying mechanisms and implications for oral chemotherapy.

Authors:  Brahma N Singh; Bimal K Malhotra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Frederik E Stuurman; Bastiaan Nuijen; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Design, synthesis and cytotoxic activity of novel sulfonylurea derivatives of podophyllotoxin.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Zhang; Jing Tian; Li-Ting Wang; Mei-Juan Wang; Xiang Nan; Liu Yang; Ying-Qian Liu; Susan L Morris-Natschke; Kuo-Hsiung Lee
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 4.  Camptothecin and podophyllotoxin derivatives: inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II - mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile.

Authors:  Jörg T Hartmann; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.