PURPOSE: Using spiral computerized tomography (CT) angiography, we sought to evaluate the incidence of a crossing vessel in a group of adults with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction who had previously undergone successful retrograde endopyelotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 patients who had undergone successful Acucise balloon incision endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, all with followup greater than 2 years, underwent a spiral CT angiogram with intravenous contrast material to identify those with a crossing vessel. Contrast enhanced CT was performed with dual phase technique on a Somatom-Plus-S CT scanner using prototype software. After 180-degree linear interpolation of the projection data, transaxial images of the affected kidney were reconstructed. In addition, at the time of the study all patients completed analog followup pain scales and quality of life assessment questionnaires. RESULTS: Among the 16 patients 6 (38%) had anterior or posterior crossing vessels based on spiral CT angiography. No patient had both types. By analog pain scale patients had 80% mean improvement in pain (range 63 to 100). CONCLUSIONS: In our series nearly 40% of patients with anterior or posterior crossing vessels had a long-term (greater than 2 years) successful outcome with retrograde endopyelotomy. Endopyelotomy continues to be our initial mode of therapy among adults with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. In our opinion the adverse influence of the crossing vessel is not sufficient to justify the added expense of preoperative angiography, spinal CT or endoluminal ultrasound.
PURPOSE: Using spiral computerized tomography (CT) angiography, we sought to evaluate the incidence of a crossing vessel in a group of adults with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction who had previously undergone successful retrograde endopyelotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 patients who had undergone successful Acucise balloon incision endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, all with followup greater than 2 years, underwent a spiral CT angiogram with intravenous contrast material to identify those with a crossing vessel. Contrast enhanced CT was performed with dual phase technique on a Somatom-Plus-S CT scanner using prototype software. After 180-degree linear interpolation of the projection data, transaxial images of the affected kidney were reconstructed. In addition, at the time of the study all patients completed analog followup pain scales and quality of life assessment questionnaires. RESULTS: Among the 16 patients 6 (38%) had anterior or posterior crossing vessels based on spiral CT angiography. No patient had both types. By analog pain scale patients had 80% mean improvement in pain (range 63 to 100). CONCLUSIONS: In our series nearly 40% of patients with anterior or posterior crossing vessels had a long-term (greater than 2 years) successful outcome with retrograde endopyelotomy. Endopyelotomy continues to be our initial mode of therapy among adults with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. In our opinion the adverse influence of the crossing vessel is not sufficient to justify the added expense of preoperative angiography, spinal CT or endoluminal ultrasound.
Authors: B Glodny; K Rapf; V Unterholzner; P Rehder; K J Hofmann; A Strasak; R Herwig; J Petersen Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 3.039