Literature DB >> 9398799

Receiver operator characteristic analysis of endoscopy as a test for gastritis.

P A Belair1, D C Metz, D O Faigel, E E Furth.   

Abstract

Endoscopic evaluation of the presence or absence of gastritis is often performed in lieu of biopsy and histologic diagnosis. The purpose of our study was to assess the value of endoscopic examination as a diagnostic test for gastritis. Two endoscopists prospectively assessed the antrum of 73 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and graded, on a scale of 0-4 (0 = completely absent, 4 = definitely present), the likelihood of gastritis. The following features were also assessed at the time of endoscopy: erythema, nodularity, erosion, edema, and friability. Two concomitant antral biopsies (3 cm from the pylorus on the greater curvature of the stomach) were performed regardless of the endoscopic impression. The histologic findings were graded independently on a scale of 0-3 by two pathologists who were not aware of the endoscopic findings. The following histologic features were graded: acute inflammation, chronic inflammation, lymphoid aggregates, intestinal metaplasia, and quantity of Helicobacter pylori organisms. Receiver operator characteristic analysis, a method derived from signal detection theory, assesses the trade-off of sensitivity and specificity over all cutoff points of a test and is considered the best method by which to compare tests and determine the diagnostic utility of a given test. Receiver operator characteristic analysis gave an area of 0.65 +/- 0.01 SE for endoscopy as a test for gastritis (0.5 = chance, 1 = perfect) as defined by the histologic presence of inflammation. Additionally, endoscopy as a test for the presence of histologically proven Helicobacter pylori gave an area of 0.55 +/- 0.01 SE. All endoscopically graded features treated as separate tests for gastritis and/or H. pylori gave areas of approximately 0.44-0.61, indicative of a poor test. While H. pylori was always associated with at least some degree of inflammation, linear regression analysis revealed no correlation among any of the histologic features or of any histologic feature with any endoscopic feature. We conclude that a tissue diagnosis is essential for the proper diagnosis of gastritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9398799     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018854315027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  17 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 2.  ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Assessment of radiologic tests: control of bias and other design considerations.

Authors:  C B Begg; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation.

Authors:  J R Beck; E K Shultz
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  The gastroscopic diagnosis of gastritis with particular reference to mucosal reddening and mucus covering.

Authors:  J Myren; A Serck-Hanssen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Correlation between gastroscopic and direct vision biopsy findings.

Authors:  J L Cronstedt; I W Simson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastritis. Diagnostic value of endoscopic criteria in relation to histological diagnosis.

Authors:  T Sauerbruch; M A Schreiber; P Schüssler; W Permanetter
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Gastritis and duodenitis--a clinical, endoscopic and histological study and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Y Kang; S J LaBrooy; A Wee
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.473

10.  Endoscopic, histological and ultrastructural correlations in chronic gastritis.

Authors:  W P Fung; J M Papadimitriou; L R Matz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Biopsy assessment of drug efficacy in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Marjorie M Walker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Web-based system for training and dissemination of a magnification chromoendoscopy classification.

Authors:  Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Ricardo Correia; Cristina Santos; Sonia Fernandes; Ernesto Palhares; Rui-Almeida Silva; Pedro Amaro; Miguel Areia; Altamiro Costa-Pereira; Luis Moreira-Dias
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Nodular gastritis and pathologic findings in children and young adults with Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Hong Koh; Tae-Woong Noh; Seoung-Yon Baek; Ki-Sup Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection according to level of endoscopic experience and the effect of training.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Watanabe; Naoyoshi Nagata; Takuro Shimbo; Ryo Nakashima; Etsuko Furuhata; Toshiyuki Sakurai; Naoki Akazawa; Chizu Yokoi; Masao Kobayakawa; Junichi Akiyama; Masashi Mizokami; Naomi Uemura
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Accuracy of Endoscopic Diagnosis of Mild Atrophic Gastritis with Helicobacter pylori Infection.

Authors:  Dae Bum Kim; Woo Chul Chung
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-07-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.