Diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma. Comparison of spiral-CTAP combined with intravenous contrast-enhanced spiral-CT and SPIO-enhanced MR combined with plain MR imaging.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether MR with and without SPIO (AMI-25) could replace spiral-CTAP in the staging of colorectal adenocarcinoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients were studied prospectively by means of i.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT, spiral-CTAP, and MR of the liver. MR imaging was performed before and after infusion of AMI-25. Diagnoses were compared to intraoperative findings (n = 35) which included intraoperative ultrasound (n = 21), and follow-up CT (n = 18). RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Fifteen patients were found to have a total number of 53 liver metastases and 43 benign lesions were detected. Evaluation was performed in four different ways: 1) i.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT; 2) i.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT + spiral-CTAP; 3) plain MR; 4) plain MR + SPIO-enhanced MR. I.v. contrast-enhanced spiral-CT, spiral-CTAP and SPIO-enhanced MR identified patients with liver metastases with equal sensitivity. However, owing to its significantly higher sensitivity, based on a lesion-by-lesion analysis, spiral-CTAP cannot be replaced by SPIO-enhanced MR in patients who are to undergo liver resection. A limitation in spiral-CTAP is its relatively low specificity.