Literature DB >> 9394472

The evolutionary design of error-rates, and the fast fixation enigma.

J Ninio1.   

Abstract

Genetic and non-genetic error-rates are analyzed in parallel for a lower and a higher organism (E. coli and man, respectively). From the comparison of mutation with fixation rates, contrasting proposals are made, concerning the arrangement of error-rates in the two organisms. In E. coli, reproduction is very conservative, but genetic variability is high within populations. Most mutations are discarded by selection, yet single mutational variants of a gene have, on average, little impact on fitness. In man, the mutation rate per generation is high, the variability generated in the population is comparatively low, and most mutations are fixed by drift rather than selection. The variants of a gene are in general more deleterious than in E. coli. There is a discrepancy in the published mutation rates: the rate of mutation fixations in human populations is twice or four times higher than the individual rate of mutation production, a feature which is not consistent with current population genetics models. Two, not mutually exclusive, hypotheses may explain this 'fast fixation enigma': (i) Mutation rates have substantially decreased in recent human evolution and (ii) A substantial fraction of the fixed mutations were generated in a process-such as gene conversion-that violates the principle of independence of mutation events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9394472     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006503508976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph        ISSN: 0169-6149            Impact factor:   1.950


  31 in total

1.  Mutator genes and selection for the mutation rate in bacteria.

Authors:  P R Painter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Duplication-targeted DNA methylation and mutagenesis in the evolution of eukaryotic chromosomes.

Authors:  M C Kricker; J W Drake; M Radman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mutations and epimutations in mammalian cells.

Authors:  R Holliday
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  The origin of mutants.

Authors:  J Cairns; J Overbaugh; S Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Error propagation in viable cells.

Authors:  J Gallant; L Palmer
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.432

6.  Incorrect aminoacylations involving tRNAs or valyl-tRNA synthetase from Bacillus stearothermophilus.

Authors:  R Giegé; D Kern; J P Ebel; H Grosjean; S de Henau; H Chantrenne
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1974-06-15

7.  Double, independent mutational events in the rpsL gene of Escherichia coli: an example of hypermutability?

Authors:  A R Timms; B A Bridges
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli.

Authors:  T T Kibota; M Lynch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Streptomycin causes misreading of natural messenger by interacting with ribosomes after initiation.

Authors:  P C Tai; B J Wallace; B D Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Retardation of cell cycle progression in yeast cells recovering from DNA damage: a study at the single cell level.

Authors:  U Wintersberger; A Karwan
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1987-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Frail hypotheses in evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Jacques Ninio
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.917

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.