Literature DB >> 9394443

Manuo-ocular coordination in target tracking. I. A model simulating human performance.

S Lazzari1, J L Vercher, A Buizza.   

Abstract

During eye tracking of a self-moved target, human subjects' performance differs from eye-alone tracking of an external target. Typical latency between target and eye motion onsets is shorter, ocular smooth pursuit (SP) saturation velocity increases and the maximum target motion frequency at which the SP system functions correctly is higher. Based on a previous qualitative model, a quantitative model of the coordination control between the arm motor system and the SP system is presented and evaluated here. The model structure maintains a high level of parallelism with the physiological system. It contains three main parts: the eye motor control (containing a SP branch and a saccadic branch), the arm motor control and the coordination control. The coordination control is achieved via an exchange of information between the arm and the eye sensorimotor systems, mediated by sensory signals (vision, proprioception) and motor command copy. This cross-talk results in improved SP system performance. The model has been computer simulated and the results have been compared with human subjects' behavior observed during previous experiments. The model performance is seen to quantitatively fit data on human subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9394443     DOI: 10.1007/s004220050386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  15 in total

1.  Anticipatory control of hand and eye movements in humans during oculo-manual tracking.

Authors:  G R Barnes; J F Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Modelling the control of interceptive actions.

Authors:  P J Beek; J C Dessing; C E Peper; D Bullock
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Pursuit eye movements involve a covert motor plan for manual tracking.

Authors:  Claudio Maioli; Luca Falciati; Tiziana Gianesini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Velocity scaling of cue-induced smooth pursuit acceleration obeys constraints of natural motion.

Authors:  Jennifer Ladda; Thomas Eggert; Stefan Glasauer; Andreas Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manual and oculomotor performance develop contemporaneously but independently during continuous tracking.

Authors:  Eric D Vidoni; Jason S McCarley; Jodi D Edwards; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adaptations of lateral hand movements to early and late visual occlusion in catching.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  LRP predicts smooth pursuit eye movement onset during the ocular tracking of self-generated movements.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Multiple spatial representations interact to increase reach accuracy when coordinating a saccade with a reach.

Authors:  Yuriria Vazquez; Laura Federici; Bijan Pesaran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Role of motor execution in the ocular tracking of self-generated movements.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Preserved motor learning after stroke is related to the degree of proprioceptive deficit.

Authors:  Eric D Vidoni; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.