| Literature DB >> 9394246 |
Abstract
An emotional debate has attended the question of whether health insurance should cover the cost of in vitro fertilization (IVF) for infertile couples. Some private health plans have opted to cover IVF, although most have not. Ten states have mandated that it be included or offered as a standard benefit for private health insurance plans. This article analyzes several key issues in the debate: the impact of insurance coverage; the cost-effectiveness of IVF; valuing the benefit of IVF; and adoption as an alternative. It recommends policy action in several areas: more efficiently allocating resources for IVF (by giving priority to couples with better chances of success, and by making more extensive use of facilities with higher success rates); ensuring that clear and reliable information about the effectiveness of IVF is available; and leveling the playing field between IVF and adoption.Entities:
Keywords: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act 1992; Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Mesh:
Year: 1997 PMID: 9394246 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-22-5-1215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Polit Policy Law ISSN: 0361-6878 Impact factor: 2.265