Literature DB >> 19343499

Public financing of IVF: a review of policy rationales.

Philipa Mladovsky1, Corinna Sorenson.   

Abstract

There is great diversity in in vitro fertilization (IVF) funding and reimbursement policies and practice throughout Europe and the rest of the world. While many existing reimbursement and regulatory frameworks address safety and legal concerns, economic factors also assume a central role. However, there are several problems with the evidence that is available on the economics of IVF. This suggests there is a need for more robust cost-effectiveness studies. It also indicates the need for alternative rationales to justify the reimbursement of IVF, which might more fully account for the social, political, ethical, and philosophical considerations embedded in notions of infertility and technology-driven reproductive treatments. The merits and limitations of five alternative rationales are discussed. The review suggests that while no existing single rationale provides a complete framework with which to support funding decisions, taken together they provide guideposts which signal important issues for consideration and highlight where further research, action, and debate are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19343499     DOI: 10.1007/s10728-009-0114-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  44 in total

1.  Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1997. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. European IVF-Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).

Authors:  K G Nygren; A N Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Public perception on infertility and its treatment: an international survey. The Bertarelli Foundation Scientific Board.

Authors:  E Y Adashi; J Cohen; L Hamberger; H W Jones; D M de Kretser; B Lunenfeld; Z Rosenwaks; A Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  B W Mol; G J Bonsel; J A Collins; M A Wiegerinck; F van der Veen; P M Bossuyt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Rationing medical care: rhetoric and reality in the Oregon Health Plan.

Authors:  J Oberlander; T Marmor; L Jacobs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  6. Ethical issues related to multiple pregnancies in medically assisted procreation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Reproductive tourism and the regulatory map.

Authors:  Debora Spar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Post-neonatal health and development of children born after assisted reproduction: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  A K Ludwig; A G Sutcliffe; K Diedrich; M Ludwig
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  State-funded IVF will make us rich... or will it?

Authors:  Anna Smajdor
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  The cost-effectiveness of IVF in the UK: a comparison of three gonadotrophin treatments.

Authors:  D Sykes; H J Out; S J Palmer; J van Loon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI.

Authors:  JohnA Collins
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparing the burden: what can we learn by comparing regulatory frameworks in abortion and fertility services?

Authors:  Sebastian Sethe; Alison Murdoch
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-12

2.  Should there be a female age limit on public funding for assisted reproductive technology?

Authors:  Drew Carter; Amber M Watt; Annette Braunack-Mayer; Adam G Elshaug; John R Moss; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Setting the stage for novel public policy and fiscal impact studies regarding the economics of in vitro fertilisation: An introduction.

Authors:  David J Walsh; Anthony P H Walsh
Journal:  J Exp Clin Assist Reprod       Date:  2010-01-15

4.  A population based economic analysis of cross-border payments for fertility services in Luxembourg.

Authors:  Christopher A Jones; Louis G Keith; Valery Bocquet; Jacques Arendt; Jean Smit; Guy Berchem; Marie-Lise Lair
Journal:  J Exp Clin Assist Reprod       Date:  2010-10-04

5.  The ethical, legal, and social issues impacted by modern assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Paul R Brezina; Yulian Zhao
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2012-01-04

6.  Cost-equivalence and Pluralism in Publicly-funded Health-care Systems.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2018-12

7.  Irresponsibly Infertile? Obesity, Efficiency, and Exclusion from Treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca C H Brown
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2019-06

Review 8.  Use of in vitro fertilization-ethical issues.

Authors:  Kjell Asplund
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.646

9.  Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Joep Geraedts; Pascal Borry; Martina C Cornel; Wybo Dondorp; Luca Gianaroli; Gary Harton; Tanya Milachich; Helena Kääriäinen; Inge Liebaers; Michael Morris; Jorge Sequeiros; Karen Sermon; Françoise Shenfield; Heather Skirton; Sirpa Soini; Claudia Spits; Anna Veiga; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Stéphane Viville; Guido de Wert; Milan Macek
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.246

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.