Literature DB >> 9392806

Permanent left atrial pacing with a specifically designed coronary sinus lead.

C Daubert1, C Leclercq, H Le Breton, D Gras, D Pavin, Y Pouvreau, P Van Verooij, N Bakels, P Mabo.   

Abstract

This article reports the original use of a specifically designed coronary sinus (CS) lead for permanent left atrial (LA) pacing. The device is characterized by its distal end shape featuring a double 45 degree angulation, which ensures very close contact with the CS upper wall. The device was successfully implanted in 39 out of 40 patients (97.5%). The tip electrode was eventually positioned in the distal CS in 9 patients, in the middle CS in 21 patients, and close to the ostium in the proximal CS in 9 patients. The mean acute pacing threshold voltage was 0.9 +/- 0.5 V with a mean impedance of 578 +/- 144 omega as measured in unipolar distal configuration at 0.5 ms pulse width (PW). The mean A wave amplitude was 3.5 +/- 2.1 mV. Early lead dislodgment occurred only once (3%) when the tip electrode was placed in the distal or middle CS, but more often (4/9 cases) when it was placed in the proximal CS. After a mean follow-up duration of 14 +/- 8.5 months, 35 of the 39 successfully implanted leads (89.7%) were still functional in terms of LA pacing and sensing. The mean chronic pacing threshold voltage was 1.5 +/- 0.8 V and the mean A wave amplitude was 2.7 +/- 1.6 mV. There were no lead related complications. In conclusion, the device proved to be safe and highly effective for permanent LA pacing, provided the distal tip could be positioned in the distal or middle part of the CS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9392806     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05433.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  8 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learnt from multisite pacing for AF management-technical challenges.

Authors:  R Mehra; B Kaemmerer; S Fitts
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Electrophysiologic assessment in selecting patients for multisite atrial pacing.

Authors:  P Delfaut; S Saksena
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Left heart pacing--experience with several types of coronary vein leads.

Authors:  Bert Hansky; Juergen Vogt; Holger Gueldner; Barbara Lamp; Gero Tenderich; Leon Krater; Johannes Heintze; Kazutomo Minami; Dieter Horstkotte; Rainer Koerfer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Evaluation of femoral approach to coronary sinus catheterisation in electrophysiological and ablation procedures: Single centre experience.

Authors:  Osama Abdel Atty; Mohamed Morsy; Mark M Gallagher
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2011-04-30

Review 5.  [Pacemaker therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation].

Authors:  A Schuchert; T Meinertz
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 6.  Device-based treatment options for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Chihiro Miyagi; Takuma Miyamoto; Jamshid H Karimov; Randall C Starling; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Pacemaker prevention therapy in drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reliability of diagnostics and effectiveness of prevention pacing therapy in Vitatron selection device.

Authors:  Paolo Terranova; Paolo Valli; Peppino Terranova; Simonetta Dell'Orto; Enrico Maria Greco
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2006-04-01

Review 8.  Visualization of elusive structures using intracardiac echocardiography: insights from electrophysiology.

Authors:  T Szili-Torok; E P McFadden; L J Jordaens; J R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.062

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.