Literature DB >> 9392057

Indications for open stone removal of urinary calculi.

K H Bichler1, S Lahme, W L Strohmaier.   

Abstract

In a retrospective study we analyzed patients undergoing open stone removal in the Department of Urology of the University of Tübingen. In 2.7% of all urinary calculi, open stone surgery was necessary. Open operation was performed on all patients with complete staghorn calculi as well as on patients with renal pelvic stones and simultaneous morphological obstruction. Partial staghorn calculi were operated on only after endoscopic treatment had failed. Small renal pelvic stones and ureteral stones were surgically removed only after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic surgery had been unsuccessful. The treatment of choice for ureteral calculi is ESWL. If ESWL is impossible, an endoscopic approach is advisable. Open operations of ureteral calculi only have to be performed if endoscopic therapy has failed or if there is a simultaneous morphological obstruction. Meta-analysis of publications from 1981 to 1995 confirmed our approach regarding indications for open stone removal. Comparison of the results reported in the literature is very difficult because of the missing, but generally accepted definition of stone free. In addition different examination techniques to determine the status 'stone free' make it difficult to compare the various studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9392057     DOI: 10.1159/000283037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  10 in total

Review 1.  Estimating the effectiveness of various methods of evacuation of kidney stones, on the basis of data obtained on percentage of "stone free" and recurrent stone formation.

Authors:  V M Bilobrov; A Roy; S V Bilobrov
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tolga Akman; Muzaffer Akçay; Murat Baykal; Mert Ali Karadağ; Ahmet Y Muslumanoglu; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-02-04

3.  Ureteral membranous band causing ureteral obstruction after the ureterolithotomy.

Authors:  Mete Kilciler; Fikret Erdemir; Selahattin Bedir; Yasar Ozgok
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Panlithiasis of the urinary tract: a case for open lithotomy in the modern era.

Authors:  Panagiotis Christopoulos; Goran Fryad; Andreas Bourdoumis; Georgios Papadopoulos; Stefanos Kachrilas; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  [Importance of open and laparoscopic stone surgery].

Authors:  M Hruza; C Türk; T Frede; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL?].

Authors:  S Lahme; V Zimmermanns; A Hochmuth; V Janitzki
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  The role of laparoscopic surgery for renal calculi management.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-02

8.  Comparative study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Yasser M Haggag; Gamal Morsy; Magdy M Badr; Abdel Baset A Al Emam; Mourad Farid; Mohamed Etafy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  The role of open stone surgery.

Authors:  Tamer El-Husseiny; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-05-02

Review 10.  An overview of treatment options for urinary stones.

Authors:  Hamid Shafi; Bobak Moazzami; Mohsen Pourghasem; Aliakbar Kasaeian
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2016
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.