Literature DB >> 9391937

Q-methodology: definition and application in health care informatics.

A L Valenta1, U Wigger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To introduce the Q-methodology research technique to the field of health informatics. Q-methodology--the systematic study of subjectivity--was used to identify and categorize the opinions of primary care physicians and medical students that contributed to our understanding of their reasons for acceptance of and/or resistance to adapting information technologies in the health care workplace.
DESIGN: Thirty-four physicians and 25 medical students from the Chicago area were surveyed and asked to rank-order 30 opinion statements about information technologies within the health care workplace. The Q-methodology research technique was employed to structure an opinion typology from their rank-ordered statements. (The rank-ordered sorts were subjected to correlation and by-person factor analysis to obtain groupings of participants who sorted the opinion statements into similar arrangements.)
RESULTS: The typology for this study revealed groupings of similar opinion-types associated with the likelihood of physicians and medical students to adapt information technology into their health care workplace. A typology of six opinions was identified in the following groups: (1) Full-Range Adopters; (2) Skills-Concerned Adopters; (3) Technology-Critical Adopters; (4) Independently-Minded and Concerned; (5) Inexperienced and Worried; and (6) Business-Minded and Adaptive. It is imperative to understand that in the application of Q-methodology, the domain is subjectivity and research is performed on small samples. The methodology is a combination of qualitative and quantitative research techniques that reveals dimensions of subjective phenomena from a perspective intrinsic to the individual to determine what is statistically different about the dimensions and to identify characteristics of individuals who share common viewpoints. Low response rates do not bias Q-methodology because the primary purpose is to identify a typology, not to test the typology's proportional distribution within the larger population.
CONCLUSION: Q-methodology can allow for the simultaneous study of objective and subjective issues to determine an individual's opinion and forecast their likeliness to adapt information technologies in the health care workplace. This study suggests that an organization's system implementers could employ Q-methodology to individualize and customize their approach to understanding the personality complexities of physicians in their organization and their willingness to adapt and utilize information technologies within the workplace.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9391937      PMCID: PMC61268          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  8 in total

1.  The four faces of eve: a typological analysis of women's personality at midlife.

Authors:  K L York; O P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1992-09

2.  Gaining physician acceptance of information technology systems.

Authors:  R T Riley; N M Lorenzi
Journal:  Med Interface       Date:  1995-11

Review 3.  Computer-based record systems that meet physician needs.

Authors:  J B Metzger; E L Drazen
Journal:  Healthc Inf Manage       Date:  1993

4.  Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns.

Authors:  F Lee; J M Teich; C D Spurr; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Q methodology: relevance and application to nursing research.

Authors:  K E Dennis
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.824

6.  Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior.

Authors:  T A Massaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Evaluation of user acceptance of a clinical expert system.

Authors:  R M Gardner; H P Lundsgaarde
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Changes in physicians' computer anxiety and attitudes related to clinical information system use.

Authors:  S H Brown; R D Coney
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE).

Authors:  Susan L Stark; Emily K Somerville; John C Morris
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

2.  Assessment of patient and caregiver needs in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome by utilizing Q-sort methodology.

Authors:  Louise W Gane; Ana-Maria Iosif; Linda Flynn-Wilson; Marielle Venturino; Randi J Hagerman; Andreea L Seritan
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.658

3.  A novel multimodal needs assessment to inform the longitudinal education program for an international interprofessional critical care team.

Authors:  Heyi Li; Yuqiang Sun; Amelia Barwise; Wenjuan Cui; Yue Dong; Aysun Tekin; Qingzhong Yuan; Lujun Qiao; Ognjen Gajic; Alexander Niven
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.263

4.  Client-centred home modifications improve daily activity performance of older adults.

Authors:  Susan Stark; Amanda Landsbaum; Janice L Palmer; Emily K Somerville; John C Morris
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.614

5.  Attitudes of Korean adults towards human dignity: a Q methodology approach.

Authors:  Kae Hwa Jo; Gyeong-Ju An; Ardith Z Doorenbos
Journal:  Jpn J Nurs Sci       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 1.418

Review 6.  Examining perspectives on the adoption and use of computer-based patient-reported outcomes among clinicians and health professionals: a Q methodology study.

Authors:  Shirley V Burton; Annette L Valenta; Justin Starren; Joanna Abraham; Therese Nelson; Karl Kochendorfer; Ashley Hughes; Bhrandon Harris; Andrew Boyd
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Analysis of ehealth search perspectives among female college students in the health professions using Q methodology.

Authors:  Michael Stellefson; Bruce Hanik; J Don Chaney; Bethany Tennant
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Found in transition: applying milestones to three unique discharge curricula.

Authors:  Lauren B Meade; Christine Y Todd; Meghan M Walsh
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research.

Authors:  Kate Churruca; Kristiana Ludlow; Wendy Wu; Kate Gibbons; Hoa Mi Nguyen; Louise A Ellis; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Patterns of perception toward influenza pandemic among the front-line responsible health personnel in southern Thailand: a Q methodology approach.

Authors:  Tapanan Prateepko; Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.