Literature DB >> 3083769

Q methodology: relevance and application to nursing research.

K E Dennis.   

Abstract

Q methodology is a unique research tradition with an epistemology and technique that is much more than the Q-sort form of instrumentation used to gather data. Developed to explore and understand the richness of human subjectivity, Q methodology, with its emphasis on the individual, is relevant to many substantive areas of scientific inquiry within nursing. This article presents an overview of the technique and delineates special considerations for implementing Q methodological investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3083769     DOI: 10.1097/00012272-198604000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci        ISSN: 0161-9268            Impact factor:   1.824


  11 in total

1.  Defining and exploring modesty in Jewish American women.

Authors:  Caryn Scheinberg Andrews
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2011-12

2.  Early results of user profiles: physicians' opinions on the use of information technology.

Authors:  A L Valenta; U Wigger
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

3.  Q-methodology: definition and application in health care informatics.

Authors:  A L Valenta; U Wigger
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  An exploration of expectations and perceptions of practicing physicians on the implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems using a Qsort approach.

Authors:  Wim Van Biesen; Daan Van Cauwenberge; Johan Decruyenaere; Tamara Leune; Sigrid Sterckx
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  Analysis of ehealth search perspectives among female college students in the health professions using Q methodology.

Authors:  Michael Stellefson; Bruce Hanik; J Don Chaney; Bethany Tennant
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.

Authors:  Anthony Chauvin; Philippe Ravaud; Gabriel Baron; Caroline Barnes; Isabelle Boutron
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals.

Authors:  Janette Perz; Jane M Ussher; Emilee Gilbert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Pragmatists, positive communicators, and shy enthusiasts: three viewpoints on Web conferencing in health sciences education.

Authors:  Ruta Valaitis; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Kevin Eva; Anthony Levinson; Bruce Wainman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Viewpoints about collaboration between primary care and public health in Canada.

Authors:  Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Ruta Valaitis; Linda O'Mara; Patricia Austin; Val Munroe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Can, Want and Try: Parents' Viewpoints Regarding the Participation of Their Child with an Acquired Brain Injury.

Authors:  Melanie Thompson; Catherine Elliott; Claire Willis; Roslyn Ward; Marita Falkmer; Torbjӧrn Falkmer; Anna Gubbay; Sonya Girdler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.