Literature DB >> 9390364

Vision and driving--a literature review and commentary.

W N Charman1.   

Abstract

The visual requirements that currently have to be met those applying for and holding current UK driving licenses for private motor vehicles are discussed, together with the incidence of road accidents and the general scientific and social problems of setting visual standards for driving. Literature relating to the effectiveness of various visual tests in predicting the accident-proneness of individual drivers is reviewed. A striking feature of the data on the age-dependence of accidents and visual performance is that although visual performance by most tests steadily declines after early middle age, older drivers have less accidents than their younger counter-parts, whose visual performance is superior. It is concluded that, although correlations between poor vision as assessed by some tests and accident rates can be shown in large samples of drivers, as yet, no single test or combination of tests has been shown to be able to effectively screen out those at risk of accidents without also leading to the disqualification of a substantial number of potentially safe drivers. Thus no change in the present visual requirements is recommended at the present time.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9390364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  14 in total

1.  Reporting by physicians of impaired drivers and potentially impaired drivers. The Committee on Bioethical Issues of the Medical Society of the State of New York.

Authors:  J T Berger; F Rosner; P Kark; A J Bennett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Why HID headlights bother older drivers.

Authors:  M A Mainster; G T Timberlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Vision and driving.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Eye movements coordinated with steering benefit performance even when vision is denied.

Authors:  M Wilson; S Stephenson; M Chattington; D E Marple-Horvat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception.

Authors:  M A Mainster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Are we blind to injuries in the visually impaired? A review of the literature.

Authors:  R Legood; P Scuffham; C Cryer
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  A practical approach to measuring the visual field component of fitness to drive.

Authors:  D P Crabb; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings; A C Viswanathan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma.

Authors:  D P Crabb; A C Viswanathan; A I McNaught; D Poinoosawmy; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Association between Glaucoma and At-fault Motor Vehicle Collision Involvement among Older Drivers: A Population-based Study.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Carrie Huisingh; Lindsay A Rhodes; Gerald McGwin; Joanne M Wood; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Predicting Future Self-Reported Motor Vehicle Collisions in Subjects with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Using the Penalized Support Vector Machine Method.

Authors:  Kenya Yuki; Ryo Asaoka; Sachiko Awano-Tanabe; Takeshi Ono; Daisuke Shiba; Hiroshi Murata; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.