Literature DB >> 28603662

Predicting Future Self-Reported Motor Vehicle Collisions in Subjects with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Using the Penalized Support Vector Machine Method.

Kenya Yuki1, Ryo Asaoka2, Sachiko Awano-Tanabe1, Takeshi Ono1, Daisuke Shiba1, Hiroshi Murata2, Kazuo Tsubota1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We predict the likelihood of a future motor vehicle collision (MVC) from visual function data, attitudes to driving, and past MVC history using the penalized support vector machine (pSVM) in subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
METHODS: Patients with POAG were screened prospectively for eligibility and 185 were analyzed in this study. Self-reported MVCs of all participants were recorded for 3 years from the baseline using a survey questionnaire every 12 months. A binocular integrated visual field (IVF) was calculated for each patient by merging a patient's monocular Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) visual fields (VFs). The IVF was divided into six regions, based on eccentricity and the right or left hemifield, and the average of the total deviation (TD) values in each of these six areas was calculated. Then, the future MVCs were predicted using various variables, including age, sex, 63 variables of 52 TD values, mean of the TD values, visual acuities (VAs), six sector average TDs with (predpenSVM_all) and without (predpenSVM_basic) the attitudes in driving, and also past MVC history, using the pSVM method, applying the leave-one-out cross validation.
RESULTS: The relationship between predpenSVM_basic and the future MVC approached significance (odds ratio = 1.15, [0.99-1.29], P = 0.064, logistic regression). A significant relationship was observed between predpenSVM_all and the future MVC (odds ratio = 1.21, P = 0.0015).
CONCLUSIONS: It was useful to predict future MVCs in patients with POAG using visual function metrics, patients' attitudes to driving, and past MVC history, using the pSVM. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Careful consideration is needed when predicting future MVCs in POAG patients using visual function, and without driving attitude and MVC history.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glaucoma; motor vehicle collision; support vector machine; visual field

Year:  2017        PMID: 28603662      PMCID: PMC5464675          DOI: 10.1167/tvst.6.3.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol        ISSN: 2164-2591            Impact factor:   3.283


  37 in total

1.  The driving visual field and a history of motor vehicle collision involvement in older drivers: a population-based examination.

Authors:  Carrie Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Joanne Wood; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Older drivers and cataract: driving habits and crash risk.

Authors:  C Owsley; B Stalvey; J Wells; M E Sloane
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Applying "Lasso" Regression to Predict Future Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Yuri Fujino; Hiroshi Murata; Chihiro Mayama; Ryo Asaoka
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Driving performance of glaucoma patients correlates with peripheral visual field loss.

Authors:  Janet P Szlyk; Carolyn L Mahler; William Seiple; Deepak P Edward; Jacob T Wilensky
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Visual and medical risk factors for motor vehicle collision involvement among older drivers.

Authors:  J M Cross; G McGwin; G S Rubin; K K Ball; S K West; D L Roenker; C Owsley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance.

Authors:  C A Johnson; J L Keltner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-03

7.  Relationship Between Motor Vehicle Collisions and Results of Perimetry, Useful Field of View, and Driving Simulation in Drivers With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Andrew J Tatham; Erwin R Boer; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Peter N Rosen; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Measuring visual field progression in the central 10 degrees using additional information from central 24 degrees visual fields and 'lasso regression'.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The relationship between central visual field damage and motor vehicle collisions in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Kenya Yuki; Ryo Asaoka; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Driving with binocular visual field loss? A study on a supervised on-road parcours with simultaneous eye and head tracking.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Katrin Sippel; Kathrin Aehling; Martin Heister; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Ulrich Schiefer; Elena Papageorgiou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Predicting the Real-World Future of Glaucoma Patients? Cautions Are Required for Machine Learning.

Authors:  Erping Long; Peixing Wan; Yehong Zhuo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.283

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.