OBJECTIVE: To determine the false negative fraction (FNF) at a small community hospital and its relation to the discovery of a significant error. STUDY DESIGN: All cervical cytologic smears (6,889) initially interpreted over a one-year period (1992) as "normal" or "near normal" were retrospectively rescreened and interpreted by outside institutions, without knowledge of the initial interpretation, to calculate yearly and quarterly FNFs. RESULTS: The overall FNF for 1992 was 12.3% and was 19.1%, 22.2%, 3.8% and 6.1% per successive quarters in 1992. A significant error was discovered at the start of the third quarter that subsequently received both local and national media attention. CONCLUSION: This study gives further proof that the FNF can be reduced to < 5% by motivated cytotechnologist/ pathologist teams, although it may not be possible to maintain this low an FNF.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the false negative fraction (FNF) at a small community hospital and its relation to the discovery of a significant error. STUDY DESIGN: All cervical cytologic smears (6,889) initially interpreted over a one-year period (1992) as "normal" or "near normal" were retrospectively rescreened and interpreted by outside institutions, without knowledge of the initial interpretation, to calculate yearly and quarterly FNFs. RESULTS: The overall FNF for 1992 was 12.3% and was 19.1%, 22.2%, 3.8% and 6.1% per successive quarters in 1992. A significant error was discovered at the start of the third quarter that subsequently received both local and national media attention. CONCLUSION: This study gives further proof that the FNF can be reduced to < 5% by motivated cytotechnologist/ pathologist teams, although it may not be possible to maintain this low an FNF.