Literature DB >> 9389952

Comparative periurethral bacteriology of uncircumcised and circumcised males.

F Serour1, Z Samra, Z Kushel, A Gorenstein, M Dan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been established that lack of circumcision increases the risk of urinary tract infection in infants. During the first six months, the presence of foreskin is associated with a greater quantity and a higher concentration of uropathogens in the periurethral area. Very little is known about this association in older males.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the periurethral bacteriology of uncircumcised healthy males of more than one year of age.
METHODS: The periurethral area of 125 uncircumcised and 46 circumcised healthy males (mean age, 26.5 and 28.3 years, respectively) was swabbed and cultured for facultative and anaerobic bacteria, genital mycoplasmas and Chlamydia trachomatis.
RESULTS: Facultative Gram positive cocci predominated in both groups (62% and 80%, respectively). Pure culture of facultative Gram negative rods was more common in uncircumcised males (17% v 4% in circumcised males, p = 0.01). Streptococci, strict anaerobes and genital mycoplasmas were found almost exclusively in uncircumcised males of more than 15 years of age. No case of C trachomatis was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: The higher prevalence of potential uropathogens in the subpreputial space is in accordance with a previous finding of increased risk of urinary tract infection in uncircumcised young men. Our results also support the role of the prepuce as a reservoir for sexually transmitted organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9389952      PMCID: PMC1195860          DOI: 10.1136/sti.73.4.288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genitourin Med        ISSN: 0266-4348


  10 in total

1.  Herpes genitalis and circumcision.

Authors:  P K Taylor; P Rodin
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1975-08

2.  John K. Lattimer Lecture. Prepuce presence portends prevalence of potentially perilous periurethral pathogens.

Authors:  T E Wiswell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Circumcision and sexually transmissible disease.

Authors:  S W Parker; A J Stewart; M N Wren; M M Gollow; J A Straton
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1983-09-17       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 4.  The association between lack of male circumcision and risk for HIV infection: a review of the epidemiological data.

Authors:  S Moses; F A Plummer; J E Bradley; J O Ndinya-Achola; N J Nagelkerke; A R Ronald
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Lack of circumcision increases the risk of urinary tract infection in young men.

Authors:  D H Spach; A E Stapleton; W E Stamm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effect of circumcision status on periurethral bacterial flora during the first year of life.

Authors:  T E Wiswell; G M Miller; H M Gelston; S K Jones; A F Clemmings
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Circumcision and periurethral carriage of Proteus mirabilis in boys.

Authors:  J Glennon; P J Ryan; C T Keane; J P Rees
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Urinary tract infections in young infants.

Authors:  C M Ginsburg; G H McCracken
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Circumcision as a risk factor for urethritis in racial groups.

Authors:  G L Smith; R Greenup; E T Takafuji
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Corroborative evidence for the decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants.

Authors:  T E Wiswell; J D Roscelli
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 7.124

  10 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Voluntary medical male circumcision: an HIV prevention priority for PEPFAR.

Authors:  Jason Bailey Reed; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli; Anne Goldzier Thomas; Melanie C Bacon; Robert Bailey; Peter Cherutich; Kelly Curran; Kim Dickson; Tim Farley; Catherine Hankins; Karin Hatzold; Jessica Justman; Zebedee Mwandi; Luke Nkinsi; Renee Ridzon; Caroline Ryan; Naomi Bock
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 2.  [Urogenital chlamydial infections in women and men].

Authors:  A Clad; W Krause
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Bacterial vaginosis is not associated with circumcision status of the current male partner.

Authors:  J M Zenilman; A Fresia; B Berger; W M McCormack
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Comparison of preputial sac and urine cultures in healthy children.

Authors:  C Savaş; M Cakmak; B Yorgancigil; M Bezir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks.

Authors:  S Moses; R C Bailey; A R Ronald
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Male circumcision and women's risk of incident chlamydial, gonococcal, and trichomonal infections.

Authors:  Abigail Norris Turner; Charles S Morrison; Nancy S Padian; Jay S Kaufman; Frieda M Behets; Robert A Salata; Francis A Mmiro; Tsungai Chipato; David D Celentano; Sungwal Rugpao; William C Miller
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 7.  What is the efficacy of circumcision in boys with complex urinary tract abnormalities?

Authors:  Mohammed Bader; Liam McCarthy
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Stephen Moreton; John N Krieger
Journal:  J Evid Based Med       Date:  2019-09-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.