Literature DB >> 3411387

Effect of circumcision status on periurethral bacterial flora during the first year of life.

T E Wiswell1, G M Miller, H M Gelston, S K Jones, A F Clemmings.   

Abstract

To determine whether bacterial colonization is a factor in the pathogenesis of urinary tract infection, we compared the periurethral bacterial flora of uncircumcised versus circumcised boys during the first year of life. Intraurethral and circumferential glans cultures were obtained from 25 circumcised and 25 uncircumcised infants at 2 days, 2 weeks, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, and 12 months of age. Different children were used at each age (300 total). The types of bacteria and the total and specific colony counts were compared. The results of the glans cultures were similar to those from the urethra. Uncircumcised boys had significantly higher total colony counts (p less than 0.003) at all ages except 12 months. Escherichia coli was present significantly more often (p less than 0.01) in the urethras of uncircumcised boys at 2 weeks, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months. Gram-negative uropathogenic organisms (Klebsiella-enterobacter, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were cultured more frequently (p less than 0.0005) from the urethras of uncircumcised boys at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months. The specific colony counts for E. coli and the other uropathogenic organisms were significantly higher (p less than 0.05) at all ages except 12 months. We conclude that during the first 6 months of life, the presence of a foreskin is associated with a greater quantity of periurethral bacteria and a greater likelihood for the presence of, as well as higher concentrations of, potentially uropathogenic organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3411387     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(88)80625-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  21 in total

1.  Is routine circumcision advised in boys with obstructive uropathy in order to prevent urinary tract infection?

Authors:  J Winberg
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  [Phimosis].

Authors:  I Rübben; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Visibility of the urethral meatus and risk of urinary tract infections in uncircumcised boys.

Authors:  Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky; Bethany J Foster; Roman Jednak; Elise Mok; David McGillivray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Is neonatal circumcision clinically beneficial? Argument in favor.

Authors:  Paul F Austin
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2008-12-09

Review 5.  Benefits of newborn circumcision: is Europe ignoring medical evidence?

Authors:  E J Schoen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Flushing of the vagina and the prepuce-a cause for contaminated urine cultures in children.

Authors:  Kjell Tullus; Nakysa Hooman; Marina Easty
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Urinary tract infection in children: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  W L Robson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Preputial bacterial colonisation in preschool and primary school children.

Authors:  Hüsnü Tokgöz; Fazli Polat; Mustafa Ozgür Tan; Bilge Sipahi; Nedim Sultan; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Circumcision: pros and cons.

Authors:  Berk Burgu; Ozgu Aydogdu; Semih Tangal; Tarkan Soygur
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.