Literature DB >> 9388107

Automated assessment of mitral regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction by a newly developed digital color Doppler velocity profile integration method.

T Hozumi1, K Yoshida, T Akasaka, T Takagi, A Yamamuro, T Yagi, J Yoshikawa.   

Abstract

Recent development of the automated cardiac flow measurement (ACFM) method has provided automated measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output by spatial and temporal integration of digital Doppler velocity profile data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the ACFM method using digital color Doppler velocity profile integration in the assessment of mitral regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction from measurements of both aortic outflow and mitral inflow volumes. We calculated both aortic outflow and mitral inflow volumes from the apical approach with the ACFM and pulsed Doppler (PD) methods in 20 patients with isolated mitral regurgitation. Mitral regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction were calculated by the following equation: mitral regurgitant volume = (mitral inflow volume) - (aortic outflow volume), % regurgitant fraction = (mitral regurgitant volume)/(mitral inflow volume) x 100. Mitral regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction were compared with that determined by the PD method. Mitral regurgitant volume measurement by the ACFM method showed a good correlation with that measured by the PD method (r = 0.90, y = 0.77x + 11.6, SEE = 9.0 ml); the mean differences between PD and ACFM measurements was -1.7 +/- 12.5 ml. Regurgitant fraction estimated by the ACFM method correlated well with that of the PD method (r = 0.92, y = 0.98x + 2.1, SEE = 8.8%). The mean difference for the measurement of regurgitant fraction between the PD and ACFM methods was 0.8 +/- 6.6%. Total time required for mitral regurgitant volume calculation in 1 cardiac cycle by the ACFM method was significantly shorter than that of the PD method (126 +/- 15 seconds vs 228 +/- 36 seconds, p <0.01). In conclusion, the newly developed ACFM method is simple, quick, and accurate in the automated assessment of mitral regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9388107     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00673-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Three dimensional colour Doppler echocardiography for the characterisation and quantification of cardiac flow events.

Authors:  T Irvine; X N Li; R Rusk; D Lennon; D J Sahn; A Kenny
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Assessment of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  T Irvine; X K Li; D J Sahn; A Kenny
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Automated quantification of aortic regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction using the digital colour Doppler velocity profile integration method in patients with aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Y Miyake; T Hozumi; I Mori; K Sugioka; A Yamamuro; T Akasaka; S Homma; K Yoshida; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Non-invasive automated assessment of the ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow in patients with atrial septal defects by the colour Doppler velocity profile integration method.

Authors:  Y Ueda; T Hozumi; K Yoshida; H Watanabe; T Akasaka; T Takagi; A Yamamuro; S Homma; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Elucidating tricuspid Doppler signal interpolation and its implication for assessing pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Seraina A Dual; Constance Verdonk; Myriam Amsallem; Jonathan Pham; Courtney Obasohan; Patrick Nataf; Doff B McElhinney; Alisa Arunamata; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Roham Zamanian; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Alison Marsden; François Haddad
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.886

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.