Literature DB >> 938720

Physical characteristics of mouse sperm nuclei.

A J Wyrobek, M L Meistrich, R Furrer, W R Bruce.   

Abstract

The nuclei of epididymal sperm, isolated from C57BL/6J and CBA/J inbred mice by their resistance to trypsin digestion, retain the shape differences of the intact sperm head. Various physical characteristics of these nuclei were measured and compared. The measurement of the projected dimensions of nuclei showed that the CBA nuclei are 13.5% longer than C57BL/6 nuclei (8.64 +/- 0.02 mum compared with 7.61 +/- 0.02 mum), 0.8% narrower (3.51 +/- 0.01 vs. 3.54 +/-0.01 mum) with 6.8% more area (22.34 +/- 0.10 vs. 20.91 +/- 0.09 mum2). However, the volumes of the nuclei as based on reconstructing calibrated electronmicrographs of serial sections of the nuclei indicated that CBA are about 7% smaller than C57BL/6 nuclei (3.72 +/- 0.08 vs. 4.01 +/- 0.03 mum3). The buoyant density of the CBA nuclei is 1.435 +/- 0.002 g/cm3 compared with 1.433 +/- 0.002 g/cm3 for the C57BL/6 nuclei as determined on linear CsCl and Renografin-76 density gradients and confirmed by a technique utilizing physiological tonicities. Therefore, the average mass of the CBA nuclei is less than that of the C57BL/6 nuclei (5.34 +/- 0.12 vs. 5.75 +/- 0.05 pg). The sedimentation velocities at unit gravity of nuclei from 11 inbred strains differ over a range of more than 6% with CBA nuclei sedimenting about 2.0% more slowly than C57BL/6 nuclei. We show that for these nuclei the sedimentation velocity can be related to their buoyant density, volume and a sedimentation shape factor. Within the errors of our measurements of these various characteristics, it was found that C57BL/6 and CBA nuclei have similar sedimentation shape factors. Therefore, the difference in sedimentation velocity between these nuclei appears to be primarily a result of differences in volume. The possible applications of these techniques to the physical separation of sperm are evaluated in the discussion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 938720      PMCID: PMC1334902          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85730-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  10 in total

1.  SPERMATOZOAN CHARACTERISTICS IN MICE OF DIFFERENT AGES.

Authors:  R A BEATTY; D P MUKHERJEE
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1963-10

2.  Spermatozoal head shape in two inbred strains of mice and their F1 and F2 progenies.

Authors:  L Illisson
Journal:  Aust J Biol Sci       Date:  1969-08

3.  The DNA content of spermatozoa from different strains of mice.

Authors:  G P Moore; R A Beatty
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1974-06

4.  Density separation of mouse spermatid nuclei.

Authors:  M Loir; A Wyrobek
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Post-fertilization maternal effects on sperm dimensions of inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  K P Pant; R A Beatty
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1973-04

6.  The genetics of the mammalian gamete.

Authors:  R A Beatty
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1970-02

7.  The small angle light scattering of biological cells. Theoretical considerations.

Authors:  P F Mullaney; P N Dean
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Selection for the length of the spermatozoan midpiece in the mouse.

Authors:  D M Woolley
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Separation of cells by velocity sedimentation.

Authors:  R G Miller; R A Phillips
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 6.384

10.  Meiotic DNA synthesis during mouse spermatogenesis.

Authors:  M L Meistrich; B O Reid; W J Barcellona
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 10.539

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Unique pattern of ORC2 and MCM7 localization during DNA replication licensing in the mouse zygote.

Authors:  Michael A Ortega; Joel Marh; Vernadeth B Alarcon; W Steven Ward
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  DNA loop domains in mammalian spermatozoa.

Authors:  W S Ward; A W Partin; D S Coffey
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  Not just heads and tails: The complexity of the sperm epigenome.

Authors:  Hannah B Gold; Yoon Hee Jung; Victor G Corces
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Salt effects on condensed protamine-DNA assemblies: anion binding and weakening of attraction.

Authors:  Jason E DeRouchey; Donald C Rau
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  The Art of Packaging the Sperm Genome: Molecular and Structural Basis of the Histone-To-Protamine Exchange.

Authors:  Lindsay Moritz; Saher Sue Hammoud
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.055

6.  Spatiotemporal organization of AT- and GC-rich DNA and their association with transition proteins TP1 and TP2 in rat condensing spermatids.

Authors:  Ullas Kolthur-Seetharam; Madapura M Pradeepa; Nikhil Gupta; Rammohan Narayanaswamy; Manchanahalli R Satyanarayana Rao
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 7.  Sperm DNA and detection of DNA fragmentations in sperm.

Authors:  Niyazi Küçük
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-01-08

8.  Sperm abnormalities in heterozygous acid sphingomyelinase knockout mice reveal a novel approach for the prevention of genetic diseases.

Authors:  Avigdor Butler; Ronald E Gordon; Shimon Gatt; Edward H Schuchman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  A model for the structure of chromatin in mammalian sperm.

Authors:  R Balhorn
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  A high-throughput method for unbiased quantitation and categorization of nuclear morphology†.

Authors:  Benjamin Matthew Skinner; Claudia Cattoni Rathje; Joanne Bacon; Emma Elizabeth Philippa Johnson; Erica Lee Larson; Emily E K Kopania; Jeffrey Martin Good; Gullalaii Yousafzai; Nabeel Ahmed Affara; Peter James Ivor Ellis
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.